Teams

Melancon/18/3.0/WN/BEVR

2025 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-17vs Caletri/18/3.0/WN/REDSWon 32
W#1 DoublesLauren Clark / Deni Breaux vs Sarah Lognion / Cristen Chadwick6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRajani Kanchadapu vs Shannon Artigue3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Guidroz / Susan Melancon vs Michelle Privat / Sarah Darouse6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBrianna Walker vs Emily Breaux6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichelle Ritter / Mary Ducote vs Jenna Hardy / Adriana Mijares4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Johnson/18/3.0/WN/BEVRWon 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ronsonet / Susan Melancon vs Angela Hutchison / Heidi Roma6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRajani Kanchadapu vs Amy Milke3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Clark / Brianna Walker vs Sarah Sonnier / Alexis DeJean6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMeagan Drury vs Valerie Guidry3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Susan Melancon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Michelle Ronsonet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Guidroz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Rajani Kanchadapu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Mary Ducote
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Deni Breaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Michelle Ritter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Brianna Walker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.49
Meagan Drury
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.36
Lori Comeaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Melancon + Debra Guidroz224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Melancon
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Michelle Ronsonet
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Debra Guidroz
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rajani Kanchadapu
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Mary Ducote
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Deni Breaux
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Michelle Ritter
2W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Brianna Walker
12W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Meagan Drury
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Lori Comeaux
4W–24L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.