Teams

Fall Winners/Pelican Bay North - Cohen

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-11vs Naples Bay Resort - AllenWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Susan Levine vs Peggy Kasilowski / Barbara Tilley6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Marsha Norris vs Mary Nugent / Ellen Schmidt6-2, 6-1
2024-12-04vs Vineyards - BowenkampWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Levine / Marsha Norris vs Debra Bowenkamp / Nancy Spiwak6-1, 6-1
2024-11-20vs Naples Bay Resort - AllenWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Levine / Lisbeth Wilson vs Deborah Miller / Barbara Tilley6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Marsha Norris vs Ellen Schmidt / Kathy Thurston6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisbeth Wilson / Debra Bowman vs Debra Bowenkamp / Katie Cohen6-0, 6-1
2024-10-30vs Naples Bay Resort - AllenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Levine / Lisbeth Wilson vs Kristine Miller / Peggy Kasilowski6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Valla / Megan Cohen vs Barbara Tilley / Ellen Schmidt0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-23vs Vineyards - BowenkampWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Levine / Gail Hayton vs Katie Cohen / Cindy Leiding6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Cohen / Marilynn Stuart vs Brenda Bensmiller / Linda Boyd6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Marsha Norris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Gail Hayton
published 3.5
3.09
Becky Cutts
published 3.5
Joann Hogan
published
Lisbeth Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Megan Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Ford
published
Susan Levine
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisbeth Wilson + Susan Levine8557% gamesnot enough data
Lisbeth Wilson + Marsha Norris3251% gamesnot enough data
Megan Cohen + Marsha Norris4159% gamesnot enough data
Lisbeth Wilson + Megan Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Cohen + Susan Levine213 matchesnot enough data
Marsha Norris + Susan Levine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marsha Norris
106W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Gail Hayton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Becky Cutts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
Joann Hogan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisbeth Wilson
63W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Cohen
38W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Ford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Levine
72W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.