Teams

KSalina (PCC)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-08vs DBurns/SPoplin (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Vega / Melissa O'Brien vs Dauphine Burns / Alana Simpson6-0, 6-2
2026-08-25vs KDavis/ABroemel (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Papadakis / Michael Nova vs Carrie Allen / Allison Broemel4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesValerie Karow / Kristin Salina vs Lindsey Vliet / Victoria Sofarelli6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKayla Rodriguez / Melissa O'Brien vs Yazmin R Delgado / Patricia Stichnoth6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-18vs GRhew (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJess Heath / Melissa O'Brien vs Gigi Freeman / Lauren Miller5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKayla Rodriguez / Meaghan Almas vs Alexis Swist / Marisa Marxen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Marcellino / Lauren Williams vs Melissa Kale / Kaitlin Vandura4-6, 3-6
2026-08-12vs KDowdy (Piper Glen)Won 20
W#1 DoublesValerie Karow / Jess Heath vs Sherri Silvia / Lisa Arnold6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Nova / Kayla Rodriguez vs Kelly Dowdy / Lindsay DS6-2, 6-2
2026-08-04vs CCaudill/MHarding (PPRSC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesValerie Karow / Nicole Vega vs Ashley Feehan / Erin Pavelchak6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Papadakis / Christina Marcellino vs Christina Murphy / Rebecca Norman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Valerie Karow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Nicole Vega
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Jess Heath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Kristin Salina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Meaghan Almas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Michael Nova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Christina Marcellino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kayla Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Papadakis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valerie Karow
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Nicole Vega
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
Jess Heath
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Kristin Salina
25W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
Meaghan Almas
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Michael Nova
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Christina Marcellino
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kayla Rodriguez
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Papadakis
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.