Teams

MT TAM RC 40MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Peter Clark
published
3.64
Jodi Krawitt
published
3.55
Nina Trowbridge
published
3.55
Kurt Burkhard
published
3.51
Paula Loeffler
published
3.42
Juanito Guzman
published
3.42
Laura Bradley
published
3.41
David Grayson
published 3.5
3.40
Joel Sklar
published
3.32
Richard Gumbiner
published
3.31
Chenin Kenig
published 3.5
3.31
Mary Schattenberg
published
3.20
David Stolberg
published 3.5
3.14
Lisa Eichler
published
3.14
Eric Engstrom
published 3.5
3.08
Megan Braga
published
3.02
Stephen Crump
published
2.92
Kathleen Walsh
published
2.82
Alison Fisker
published 3
Jennifer Sterne
published
MARK CARBONE
published
Nicola Trwst
published
William Forbes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Burkhard + Alison Fisker303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Eichler + Stephen Crump033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Clark
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.72
Jodi Krawitt
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nina Trowbridge
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kurt Burkhard
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Paula Loeffler
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Juanito Guzman
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Laura Bradley
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
David Grayson
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.41
Joel Sklar
17W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Richard Gumbiner
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Chenin Kenig
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Mary Schattenberg
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
David Stolberg
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
Lisa Eichler
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Eric Engstrom
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
Megan Braga
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Stephen Crump
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kathleen Walsh
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Alison Fisker
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
Jennifer Sterne
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
MARK CARBONE
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicola Trwst
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Forbes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.