Teams

KTAC-Hutchins

2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-07vs PritchardWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Horn / Carol Wurden vs Dave Ketchum / Rene Ketchum7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Cattell / Lindsey Anderson vs Jim Pritchard / Melanie Redding6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteve Hutchins / Jill Wallen vs Dennis Karras / Patti Johnson6-4, 6-4
2021-08-07vs PritchardLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Cattell / Lindsey Anderson vs Dennis Karras / Patti Johnson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteve Hutchins / Carol Wurden vs Michael Huffman / Kathi McKay3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Horn / Chiyuki Sugimoto vs Jim Pritchard / Melanie Redding6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-07-17vs PritchardWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Cattell / Lindsey Anderson vs Michael Huffman / Kathi McKay7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Hutchins / Jill Wallen vs Dennis Karras / Patti Johnson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Blankenship / Chiyuki Sugimoto vs Dave Ketchum / Rene Ketchum2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-17vs PritchardWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Anderson / John Cattell vs Jim Pritchard / Melanie Redding6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteve Hutchins / Jill Wallen vs Michael Huffman / Kathi McKay6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Blankenship / Chiyuki Sugimoto vs Rene Ketchum / Dave Ketchum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTAC-Hutchins3184996
2Pritchard134818126

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Lindsey Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Chiyuki Sugimoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Jill Wallen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
John Cattell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Steve Hutchins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Chris Blankenship
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mark Horn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Cattell + Lindsey Anderson10455% games−0.3% vs expected
Jill Wallen + Steve Hutchins41045% games−11.3% vs expected
Chiyuki Sugimoto + Chris Blankenship4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsey Anderson
95W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Chiyuki Sugimoto
136W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jill Wallen
70W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
John Cattell
157W–68L career · 7 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Steve Hutchins
73W–99L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Chris Blankenship
57W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
0
Mark Horn
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.