Teams

SCC Cacciotti

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs ACAC Callaghan / BartholomewWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Julie Kearfott vs Theresa Bartholomew / Kathryn Williams6-4, 6-2
2022-06-15vs Westwood AnthonySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Kristin Kim vs Lil Racelis / Rose Yuen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Stacey Gray vs Jessica van Tuyle / Meredith Schwartz6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Kristin Kim vs Mary Elizabeth Barnes / Lucinda Stanchina6-3, 6-4
2022-06-08vs HCC StinsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatherine Duncan / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Elizabeth Betz / Amery Whitby3-6, 4-6
2022-06-01vs Raintree MartinLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Boyd / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Donna Moody / Bridget Westhoven4-6, 3-6
2022-05-25vs Twin Hickory YuWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Boyd / Julie Kearfott vs Michelle Yu / Cathy Parker6-0, 6-4
2022-05-20vs Westwood AnthonyWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Julie Kearfott vs Holley Nilson / Lil Racelis6-4, 7-5
2022-05-18vs Southhampton LockhartLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Sara Manners vs Judy Napier / Linda Larue1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Stacey Gray vs Susan Lockhart / Eileen Cerny1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Sara Manners
published
3.44
Marianne Lane
published
3.33
Julie Kearfott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Karin Speizer
published
3.30
Kristin Kim
published
3.30
Stacey Gray
published
3.25
Katherine Duncan
published
3.05
Cheryl Cacciotti
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
published
Tara Hudson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Cacciotti + Julie Kearfott5651% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Manners
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Marianne Lane
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Julie Kearfott
146W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Karin Speizer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Kristin Kim
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Stacey Gray
21W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Katherine Duncan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.25
3
Cheryl Cacciotti
67W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
Stacey Piotrowski
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tara Hudson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.