Teams

Yadkin/Thomas/55+3.5

2024 Yadkin Valley Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women Tuesday Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-05vs Yadkin/Haggard/55 3.5 DayLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeborah Foster / Eva Owens vs Julia Barnes / Margret Padgett6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-16vs Yadkin/Haggard/55 3.5 DayWon 10
W#3 DoublesThuy Smith / Eva Owens vs Margret Padgett / Gloria Gamble6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-14vs Yadkin/Haggard/55 3.5 DayLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Wilson / Eva Owens vs Kelly Pryzwansky / Amy Dulin2-6, 1-6
2024-03-24vs Yadkin/Haggard/55 3.5 DayLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeborah Foster / Eva Owens vs Lynette Paley / Christian Buchholz4-6, 0-6
2024-03-12vs Yadkin/Haggard/55 3.5 DayLost 01
L#3 DoublesEva Owens / Cristina Fernandes vs Lynette Paley / Kelly Pryzwansky1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Tuesday Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Laura Varsik
published
3.27
Cristina Fernandes
published 3.5
3.22
Laura Gregory
published
3.18
Susan Bjerke
published
3.14
Bonnie Colhoun
published 3.5
3.00
Thuy Smith
published
2.87
Eva Owens
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Mitzi Cartrette
published
2.73
Deborah Foster
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eva Owens + Deborah Foster2353% games+8.8% vs expected
Cristina Fernandes + Susan Bjerke2549% games+1.8% vs expected
Cristina Fernandes + Laura Gregory1442% games−14.3% vs expected
Eva Owens + Thuy Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bjerke + Laura Gregory134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Varsik
56W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Cristina Fernandes
7W–33L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Laura Gregory
23W–26L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Susan Bjerke
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bonnie Colhoun
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Thuy Smith
78W–86L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Eva Owens
24W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.87
Mitzi Cartrette
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Deborah Foster
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.