Teams

ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 11 9:30 AM
vs
Tournament Players Club Piper Glen
Sep 18 9:30 AM
vs
Park Crossing Recreation Club
Sep 25 9:30 AM
vs
Tournament Players Club Piper Glen
Oct 2 9:30 AM
Carmel Country Club
2026-09-04vs KCox (MPCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Smith / Kim Sheehey vs Torey Parsons / Catherine Hensley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Crocker / Carrie Coulson vs Jennifer Farrell / Suzanne Crutcher7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmanda Cheek / Katie Bissett vs Sarah Ryan / Patti Glassner6-1, 6-1
2026-08-28vs SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Hunley / Kim Sheehey vs Mary Laird Garrison / Shaynah Jerrell7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHilary Lee / Carrie Coulson vs Starr Stroud / Martha Metzl6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatie Bissett / Shelley Crocker vs Christina Wright / Anne Whalan6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-21vs TBlankenship (PCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Cheek / Katie Bissett vs Janet Gilliam / Lacey Johnson Boatman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHilary Lee / Linda Hunley vs Penny Hill / Sylvia Walker7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHayley Franc / Katie Natterman vs Jan Aspey / Valerie Karow3-6, 3-6
2026-08-14vs AMilas (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Sheehey / Patty Swan vs Susie Williams / Nicki Spang2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHilary Lee / Kate Loor vs Sarah Hawkins / Amber Filingeri0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHayley Franc / Robin Smith vs Alison Milas / Josey Waleski1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kim Sheehey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Cheek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Angela Donathan
published 3.5
3.21
Carrie Coulson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Shelley Crocker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Hayley Franc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Hilary Lee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Hunley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Katie Bissett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Kate Loor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Patty Swan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Katie Natterman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayley Franc + Hilary Lee4643% games−1.8% vs expected
Hilary Lee + Kim Sheehey2641% gamesnot enough data
Linda Hunley + Kim Sheehey4359% gamesnot enough data
Kate Loor + Shelley Crocker4160% gamesnot enough data
Katie Bissett + Kim Sheehey2355% gamesnot enough data
Angela Donathan + Katie Bissett314 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Crocker + Kim Sheehey224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Bissett + Carrie Coulson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim Sheehey
54W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Amanda Cheek
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Angela Donathan
85W–52L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Carrie Coulson
57W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Shelley Crocker
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
3.5
Hayley Franc
80W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Hilary Lee
105W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Linda Hunley
26W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Katie Bissett
67W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Kate Loor
49W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Patty Swan
64W–80L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Katie Natterman
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.