Teams

Westwood - Kelly 8.5

2025 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-16vs Burkwood Sinsabaugh 8.5 MixLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Altaffer / Craig Heah vs Robin Tyler / Keith Harvey6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-11-09vs Belmont Ruth Combo Mixed 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Alwine / Jackson Dyer vs Naveen Chennupati / Lindsay Bazydlo4-6, 2-6
2025-11-02vs KRA Gerecke 8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesAlicia Cecil / Jackson Dyer vs Lauren Hauk / Jon Kilberg6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Alwine / Kory Painter vs Kristin Tetterton / Chris Gerecke3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-20vs SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesMegan Alwine / Greg Robinson vs Michelle Nelson / Michael Miller6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Kelly / Jackson Dyer vs Laura Lafors / Andrew Zima7-5, 6-4
2025-10-04vs MAC Snow Hammers 8.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMegan Alwine / Greg Robinson vs Matthew Morris / Delaney Rhodus7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Burkwood Sinsabaugh 8.5 MixLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackson Dyer / Elizabeth Kelly vs Brett Sinsabaugh / Susan Powell3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Leslie Altaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Kevin Long
published
4.32
Megan Alwine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
published
4.12
Dale Nowery
published 4.5
3.90
Becca Meekins
published 4
3.82
Andrew Cecil
published 4
3.82
Kory Painter
published
3.79
Craig Heah
published 4
3.74
Jackson Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Lauren Jones
published
3.57
Dutch Jones
published
Greg Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Dutch Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Jackson Dyer + Megan Alwine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Leslie Altaffer
72W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
Kevin Long
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Megan Alwine
110W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Dale Nowery
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
4
Becca Meekins
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Andrew Cecil
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kory Painter
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Craig Heah
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Jackson Dyer
140W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Lauren Jones
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Dutch Jones
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Greg Robinson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.