← Teams

THPRD-Kershaw

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Katherine Lomartire
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Dean Waters
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Sandi Martes
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
David Lomartire
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Michael Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 0
—
Steve Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-12-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Steve Sanford vs Nancy Williams / Richard Sohn6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJessi Sevy / Michael Sheridan vs Rebecca Roberts / Brian Hefele6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHideko Kershaw / Dean Waters vs Susie Jansky / Tuan Truong6-2, 6-1
2018-11-18Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesSteve Sanford / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Julie Arness / Craig Mcreary6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandi Martes / David Lomartire vs Rich Johnson / Mary Chennault6-1, 6-2
2018-11-17Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Steve Sanford vs Sarah Ferrer / Kevin Jarvis6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHideko Kershaw / Dean Waters vs Albert Hensley / Michele Sutherland6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSandi Martes / David Lomartire vs Tarynn Berkman / Duy Nguyen6-1, 6-2
2018-11-10Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Katherine Lomartire vs Stephanie Haas / Julian Miller6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Sheridan / Jessi Sevy vs Anna Myers / Peter Farrelly6-2, 7-6
2018-11-04Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesMichael Sheridan / Kay Hallmark vs Jennifer Woodard / Rick Davis6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSandi Martes / David Lomartire vs Crystal Bryant / Christopher Shaw6-2, 6-0
2018-10-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKay Hallmark / Michael Sheridan vs Erin Prince / Jeff Anhaltzer6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSandra Ellis / Steve Sanford vs Nancy Osborne / Stephen Osborne2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHideko Kershaw / Dean Waters vs Joann Donahue / Allen Muhich2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2018-09-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKay Hallmark / Michael Sheridan vs Susheela Jayapal / Paul Laurent6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Lomartire / Steve Sanford vs Erin Rothrock - * / Tod Breslau6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHideko Kershaw / Dean Waters vs Marianne Dwyer / James Lang6-4, 7-5
2018-09-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Michael Sheridan vs Debbie Frankel / Wes Haas4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Lomartire / Steve Sanford vs Kimberly Stockstad / Jason Fitzgerald6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Lomartire / Sandi Martes vs Felicia Phillips / Bala Prashanth Reddy Chappidi6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Katherine Lomartire
13W–27L career
2%94%5%
3.32
3.5
Dean Waters
30W–42L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Sandi Martes
137W–98L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
119W–97L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
David Lomartire
21W–28L career
0%99%1%
2.78
0
Michael Sheridan
37W–37L career
not enough data
—
0
Steve Sanford
31W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.