Teams

APineda-CHTC

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25vs JByrd-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Curry vs Craig Radley4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJOE BERTON vs Jonathan Carter2-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs EAnderson-DFCLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephen Stark vs Edward Anderson3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGanesh Kamath vs Jason Liss1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBurak Erdim vs Christopher Green6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-11vs KRamaswamy-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesGanesh Kamath vs Kiran Ramaswamy6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBurak Erdim vs Karan Mehra6-4, 6-3
2026-06-04vs JByrd-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesStephen Stark vs Mike Meske0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBurak Erdim vs Nikita Poujai6-0, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJOE BERTON vs Craig Radley2-6, 6-7
2026-06-01vs JByrd-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesBurak Erdim vs Manuel Mariategui Vargas3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJOE BERTON vs Mike Meske0-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs EAnderson-DFCLost 02
L#1 SinglesStephen Stark vs Christopher Green3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMatthew Curry vs Edward Anderson1-6, 2-6
2026-05-15vs EAnderson-DFCWon 21
W#1 SinglesStephen Stark vs Rod Snyder6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGanesh Kamath vs Charles Wood7-5, 7-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew Curry vs Christopher Green6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-14vs KRamaswamy-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGanesh Kamath vs Diego Angelo6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBurak Erdim vs Karan Mehra6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APineda-CHTC3591531214
2EAnderson-DFC3591535232
3KRamaswamy-DUR2661840265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Ganesh Kamath
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.65
JOE BERTON
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Stephen Stark
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.61
Burak Erdim
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.61
Matthew Curry
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 22% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ganesh Kamath
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
JOE BERTON
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Stephen Stark
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Burak Erdim
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.