← Teams

VTC-Shook

2024 Adult 70 & Over · Men

8 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Mister Archedon
published 3.5
3.09
Steve Thunstedt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Lee Wiegand
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
David Shook
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Steven Darling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Jeff Sunshine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Robert Hillison
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
—
Walter Schwane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-08-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJeff Sunshine / Steve Thunstedt vs Doug Cumming / Les Wellman7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Shook / Steven Darling vs Paul Blankenmeister / Bob Anderson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLee Wiegand / Robert Hillison vs William Place / Gary Rebello6-0, 6-0
2024-08-15Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Steven Darling vs Jim Cullison / Gary McKenzie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Bob McBride vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Sunshine / Greg Luevano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDavid Shook / Lee Wiegand vs William Melton / Jack Crossen6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBob McBride / Steve Thunstedt vs Doug van Nostran / Dug Barnett6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Luevano / Walter Schwane vs Raymur Murray / Anthony Webb6-2, 6-3
2024-07-19Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / David Shook vs Thomas Mehlhorn / Randall Sinn6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLee Wiegand / Steve Thunstedt vs Mark Becker / Randolph Splitter7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRobert Hillison / Greg Luevano vs Jim Borell / William Pettis6-4, 6-2
2024-07-10Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Lee Wiegand vs Terry Chung / Jim Gerber6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Bob McBride vs Eugene Avery / Philip Rothrock6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWalter Schwane / Robert Hillison vs Dave Brown / Stanley Zaklan6-2, 6-3
2024-06-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Steven Darling vs Michael Stone / Scott Quinn6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Shook / Steve Thunstedt vs Ken Bolton / James Carey7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Hillison / Lee Wiegand vs Charles Ross / Michael McTague6-2, 6-0
2024-06-12Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Shook / Steve Thunstedt vs Tom Lonergan / Gary McKenzie7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMister Archedon / Robert Hillison vs Peter Kosky / Jim Cullison6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Sunshine / Greg Luevano vs Bob Nichols / Pedro Vila6-1, 6-2
2024-06-07Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Steven Darling vs Ray Baxter / Don Dowling6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Jeff Sunshine vs Douglas Walker / Kimbal Logan7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGreg Luevano / Walter Schwane vs Bill Swift / Pete Crystal6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Mister Archedon
108W–47L career
7%93%0%
3.12
3.5
Steve Thunstedt
32W–46L career · type S
25%74%1%
3.09
3
Lee Wiegand
62W–61L career · type A
0%70%30%
3.05
3
David Shook
34W–36L career
0%91%9%
2.92
3
Steven Darling
63W–87L career
0%99%1%
2.82
3
Jeff Sunshine
21W–22L career
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Robert Hillison
18W–8L career · type A
0%41%59%
2.48
2.5
Walter Schwane
20W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.