Teams

Alachua/Torres

2026 Alachua Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 W Fri

19 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-31vs JTC NeelandsLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrea Love / Cristi Dobbs vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Alison Andrus4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJordan Davis vs Anita Rajasekhar4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Stoppelli / Wheeler Crawford vs Julie Sager / Ashley Spink4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLauren Indelicato / Mara Rodriguez vs Jenny Neelands / Irina Madorsky6-7, 1-6
2026-05-17vs JTC NeelandsWon 31
L#1 DoublesCristi Dobbs / Dawn Dean vs Jenny Neelands / Julie Sager4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJordan Davis vs Elizabeth Dickerson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTARA BROMIRSKI / Samantha Bohon vs Kim Magee / Alison Andrus6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Love / Abby Klatsky vs Frances Revere / Christine Padron6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-15vs JTC NeelandsWon 31
L#1 DoublesCaroline Hord / Lynn Godwin vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Julie Sager5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Ghiaseddin vs Ashley Spink6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Gibson / Tammy Miller vs Kim Magee / Alison Andrus7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracey Bryant / Samantha Bohon vs Anita Rajasekhar / Nicole Millsaps6-0, 6-1
2026-05-03vs JTC NeelandsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTara Edelstein / Mara Rodriguez vs Anita Rajasekhar / Julie Sager1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAbby Klatsky vs Elizabeth Dickerson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTracey Bryant / Rhoda Wilburn vs Christine Padron / Andrea Washak6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWheeler Crawford / Cristi Dobbs vs Jenny Neelands / Megan Ryals6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-26vs JTC NeelandsWon 31
L#1 DoublesWheeler Crawford / Jordan Davis vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Julie Sager3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAbby Klatsky vs Jenny Neelands6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Gibson / Tammy Miller vs Kim Magee / Frances Revere7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Dean / Lynn Godwin vs Irina Madorsky / Anita Rajasekhar6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-19vs JTC NeelandsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHeather Gibson / Alison Ghiaseddin vs Anita Rajasekhar / Julie Sager2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJordan Davis vs Nicole Millsaps6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Indelicato / Andrea Love vs Kim Magee / Alison Andrus4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRhoda Wilburn / Caroline Hord vs Megan Ryals / Frances Revere7-5, 6-3
2026-04-12vs JTC NeelandsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTara Edelstein / Natalie Stoppelli vs Irina Madorsky / Andrea Washak6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLauren Indelicato vs Anita Rajasekhar7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTammy Miller / Lynn Godwin vs Julie Sager / Elizabeth Dickerson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMara Rodriguez / Dawn Dean vs Jenny Neelands / Jennifer Hitchcock6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Fri have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Wheeler Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Samantha Bohon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Tracey Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Jordan Davis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Tammy Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Caroline Hord
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Alison Ghiaseddin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.70
TARA BROMIRSKI
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Rhoda Wilburn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Tara Edelstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Dawn Dean
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Lynn Godwin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Abby Klatsky
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Lauren Indelicato
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Mara Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Cristi Dobbs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Andrea Love
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Heather Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Natalie Stoppelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Bryant + Rhoda Wilburn224 matchesnot enough data
Tara Edelstein + Cristi Dobbs044 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Miller + Heather Gibson314 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Bryant + Dawn Dean213 matchesnot enough data
Cristi Dobbs + Dawn Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Cristi Dobbs + Rhoda Wilburn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Samantha Bohon
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Tracey Bryant
48W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Jordan Davis
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
Tammy Miller
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Caroline Hord
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Alison Ghiaseddin
17W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
TARA BROMIRSKI
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Rhoda Wilburn
86W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Tara Edelstein
88W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Dawn Dean
44W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.65
Lynn Godwin
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Abby Klatsky
4W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lauren Indelicato
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Mara Rodriguez
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Cristi Dobbs
60W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Andrea Love
9W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Heather Gibson
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.31
Natalie Stoppelli
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.