Teams

Latiolais/18/4.5/WN/BEVR

2026 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 4.5 LAF (18&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-12vs Dugas/18/4.5/WN/CCRRLost 23
L#1 DoublesMonique Bozeman / Bonnie E McDonald vs Holly Hagle / Kendra Domingue6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSuellyn Charbonnet vs Jeanne Marie Savoy6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmanda Latiolais / Kathryn MacIcek vs Tammi Robicheaux / Sherry Wilson6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKaty Shoptaugh vs Mary Beth McElligott0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Harris / Aimee Cormier vs Nicole Bergeron / Gipson Erwin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-19vs Dugas/18/4.5/WN/CCRRLost 23
W#1 DoublesMaghann Judice / Amanda Latiolais vs Nicole Bergeron / Mary Beth McElligott6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAimee Cormier vs Courtney Dugas5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMonique Bozeman / Catherine Luc vs Holly Hagle / Gipson Erwin3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKathryn MacIcek vs Gabriela Incera0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPenny Ayo / Suellyn Charbonnet vs Jeanne Marie Savoy / Sherry Wilson6-1, 6-1
2026-01-29vs Dugas/18/4.5/WN/CCRRWon 32
W#1 DoublesCatherine Luc / Penny Ayo vs Ashley Guidry / Holly Hagle6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSuellyn Charbonnet vs Gabriela Incera1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBonnie E McDonald / Tonya Anderson vs Kendra Domingue / Jeanne Marie Savoy6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKaty Shoptaugh vs Courtney Dugas0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Harris / Aimee Cormier vs Tammi Robicheaux / Mary Beth McElligott6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 LAF (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bonnie E McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Suellyn Charbonnet
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Aimee Cormier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Amanda Latiolais
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Maghann Judice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Penny Ayo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Catherine Luc
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Sonia Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.82
Kathryn MacIcek
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Monique Bozeman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Tonya Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katy Shoptaugh
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Cormier + Amanda Latiolais123 matchesnot enough data
Suellyn Charbonnet + Amanda Latiolais033 matchesnot enough data
Monique Bozeman + Catherine Luc213 matchesnot enough data
Monique Bozeman + Amanda Latiolais123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Luc + Sonia Taylor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bonnie E McDonald
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suellyn Charbonnet
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Aimee Cormier
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Amanda Latiolais
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.12
Maghann Judice
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Penny Ayo
29W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Catherine Luc
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Sonia Taylor
35W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Kathryn MacIcek
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Monique Bozeman
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Tonya Anderson
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Katy Shoptaugh
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.