Teams

CC- LLWx - SLOCC Lilac & Lethal

2026 USTA CC Spring Adult 18 & OVER · CC USTA 3.5W 18 & OVER

19 players · average NTRP 3.32 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-24vs CC Paso Amy's AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Comerford / Jami Wozniak vs Tammy Lawson / Patti Baldwin6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristen Bertram-Spiegel / Genevieve Arjal vs Nicole Schmit / Emily Rutter6-2, 6-2
2026-06-05vs CC SLOCC Synergy Sp26Won 20
W#1 DoublesJade Fox / Danielle Corry vs Dede Bodnar / Jean Kennedy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Comerford / Abrianna Rose vs Stephanie Ventura / Tami Rose6-2, 6-2
2026-05-31vs CC SMCC MealsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbrianna Rose / Jami Wozniak vs Kayla Ford / Colleen Thompson7-6, 7-5
2026-05-15vs CC Avila Court CandyWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Comerford / Abrianna Rose vs Corrin LePell / Nicole MacDonald6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSabrina Ball / Ellyn Billingsley vs Carolyn Doud / Lindsey Palmerston6-4, 6-0
2026-05-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEllyn Billingsley / Shelle Ball vs Karen Gordon / Deborah VANDENBERG5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEllyn Billingsley / Camila Strong vs Karen Hutchison / Jennifer Manduffie6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CC USTA 3.5W 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC- LLWx - SLOCC Lilac & Lethal701837121
2CC SLOCC Synergy Sp265212918159
3CC - LL2x - MBHS Central Coast Court Queens5212924209
4CC Avila Court Candy4312922182
5CC Paso Amy's Aces3481329213
6CC TTR Batistic1671431224
7CC Avila Fireballs1661531214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Abrianna Rose
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.67
Jade Fox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
Danielle Corry
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.62
Nicole Nicholson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Camila Strong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Carolyn Comerford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Sabrina Ball
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Nikki Billingsley
published
3.35
Jami Wozniak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Ellyn Billingsley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Lauren Bordeman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.14
Genevieve Arjal
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.93
Sydney Ereno
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Cindy Gresser
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Alicia Iqbal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carlee Starkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kristen Bertram-Spiegel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shelle Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sierra Hulin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Billingsley + Abrianna Rose10271% games+11.1% vs expected
Cindy Gresser + Sydney Ereno4249% gamesnot enough data
Ellyn Billingsley + Abrianna Rose314 matchesnot enough data
Jami Wozniak + Abrianna Rose303 matchesnot enough data
Abrianna Rose + Danielle Corry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abrianna Rose
45W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.72
3.5
Jade Fox
3W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.67
3.5
Danielle Corry
16W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Nicole Nicholson
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Camila Strong
43W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Carolyn Comerford
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.46
Sabrina Ball
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Nikki Billingsley
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jami Wozniak
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ellyn Billingsley
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Lauren Bordeman
18W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.24
3
Genevieve Arjal
9W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Sydney Ereno
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Cindy Gresser
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Alicia Iqbal
11W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Carlee Starkey
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Bertram-Spiegel
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shelle Ball
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sierra Hulin
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.