Teams

LTC:Ballboys 55:Nicoletta/Friguglietti

2022 WMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 8.0 Men 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-22vs Bay Road:Amherst Aces:HirshWon 21
W#1 DoublesHans Doup / Frank Friguglietti vs Jonathan Hirsh / Joseph Moore6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRussell Moore / James Bregianes vs Alden Booth / Niels Christiansen6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephen Perry / Jeffrey Przekopowski vs Richard Getler / Benjamin Thompson5-7, 3-6
2022-05-01vs Bay Road:Amherst Aces:HirshLost 12
W#1 DoublesHans Doup / Frank Friguglietti vs Richard Getler / Alden Booth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNeville Bogle / Frank Mochak vs Niels Christiansen / Christopher Seibert3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert LaPalme / Jeffrey Przekopowski vs Benjamin Thompson / Jonathan Hirsh6-7, 3-5
2022-04-02vs Bay Road:Amherst Aces:HirshLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Bregianes / Hans Doup vs Richard Getler / Benjamin Thompson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFrank Friguglietti / Frank Mochak vs Niels Christiansen / Christopher Seibert0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-27vs Bay Road:Amherst Aces:HirshLost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Moore / Hans Doup vs Richard Getler / Alden Booth2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Bregianes / Frank Friguglietti vs Niels Christiansen / Christopher Seibert1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert LaPalme / Jeffrey Przekopowski vs Jonathan Hirsh / Benjamin Thompson2-6, 1-6
2022-03-12vs Bay Road:Amherst Aces:HirshWon 21
W#1 DoublesHans Doup / James Bregianes vs Henry Hardy / Joseph Moore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRussell Moore / Richard Charpentier vs Benjamin Thompson / Alden Booth6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesFrank Friguglietti / John Morizio vs Niels Christiansen / Christopher Seibert0-6, 3-6
2022-02-27vs Bay Road:Amherst Aces:HirshWon 21
W#1 DoublesHans Doup / James Bregianes vs Niels Christiansen / Nathaniel Whitaker6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFrank Mochak / Russell Moore vs Henry Hardy / Alden Booth6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Przekopowski / Stephen Perry vs Peter Ghitman / Christopher Seibert6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bay Road:Amherst Aces:Hirsh3310819153
2LTC:Ballboys 55:Nicoletta/Friguglietti3381021161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Hans Doup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Frank Friguglietti
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
David Gordon
published 3.5
3.18
John Morizio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Stephen Perry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Frank Mochak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Robert LaPalme
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Bregianes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jeffrey Przekopowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Neville Bogle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Charpentier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Russell Moore
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert LaPalme + Stephen Perry2439% gamesnot enough data
Richard Charpentier + Frank Friguglietti3252% gamesnot enough data
John Morizio + Robert LaPalme2346% gamesnot enough data
Frank Friguglietti + Frank Mochak3254% gamesnot enough data
Frank Friguglietti + Robert LaPalme3251% gamesnot enough data
Frank Mochak + Robert LaPalme1443% gamesnot enough data
John Morizio + Frank Friguglietti134 matchesnot enough data
Frank Friguglietti + Hans Doup314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hans Doup
29W–25L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Frank Friguglietti
44W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
David Gordon
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Morizio
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Stephen Perry
36W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Frank Mochak
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Robert LaPalme
14W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
James Bregianes
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeffrey Przekopowski
36W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Neville Bogle
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Richard Charpentier
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Russell Moore
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.