Teams

EMcNamara-CHTC

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-19vs CYu-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesSheridan Meltsner vs Sapna Varkey1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBrook Holton Sheahan vs Anita Yang7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesUlrike Foley vs Mackenzie Warner6-4, 6-2
2025-11-13vs HWhite-UNCLost 01
L#3 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Sarah Franks1-6, 1-6
2025-11-05vs LHabib-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Kelsey Kowalski6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Rachel Tam6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBrook Holton Sheahan vs Katie Evans6-0, 6-1
2025-10-22Split 11
L#2 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Anna Brown3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSheridan Meltsner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-15vs LCarlson-DFCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Laura Carlson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSheridan Meltsner vs Erin Reiter6-4, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Amy Hoots
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.87
Brook Holton Sheahan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.78
Elizabeth McNamara
published
3.65
Ulrike Foley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Nhon Nicole Cobb
published
3.49
Sheridan Meltsner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Andy Blackburn
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheridan Meltsner + Brook Holton Sheahan14364% games+5.5% vs expected
Sheridan Meltsner + Andy Blackburn2348% gamesnot enough data
Brook Holton Sheahan + Elizabeth McNamara303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Hoots
105W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.17
4
Brook Holton Sheahan
217W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Elizabeth McNamara
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ulrike Foley
81W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Nhon Nicole Cobb
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Sheridan Meltsner
95W–123L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Andy Blackburn
114W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.