Teams

Naples YMCA /Rodriguez

2025 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 8.5 Women Spring

15 players · average NTRP 4.21 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-21vs Marco YMCA / WashakWon 21
L#1 DoublesFlora Rodriguez / Sarah Guglielmo vs Tonja Brewer / Ann Garvey6-2, 2-2
W#2 DoublesNannette Staropoli / Sandee Kozel vs Julie Cologero / Susanna Haedelt6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDana Wagoner / Terry Dirr vs Marzenna Nowak / Bernadette DiPino6-2, 6-2
2025-05-07vs MontereyLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Macey Tyll vs Kari Gustafson / Chrissy Rogers3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesFlora Rodriguez / Sarah Guglielmo vs Nicki Sebold / Brittany Lawson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNannette Staropoli / Terry Dirr vs Diana Wong / Kimberly DiStefano4-6, 3-6
2025-04-30vs Marco YMCA / WashakSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDonna Curry / Rebecca Tessitore vs Diana Britton / Ann Garvey4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRosa Thakkar / Paige Radostits vs Kristy Cardina / Sindi Sanzica6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-16vs MontereyLost 02
L#1 DoublesDana Wagoner / Macey Tyll vs Nicki Sebold / Brittany Lawson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNannette Staropoli / Sandee Kozel vs Kari Gustafson / Chrissy Rogers4-6, 4-6
2025-04-09vs Marco YMCA / WashakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Tessitore / Lisa McGillis vs Cheryl Solimine / Cynthia George2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRosa Thakkar / Flora Rodriguez vs Marzenna Nowak / Tracy Maurer6-4, 6-0
2025-03-26vs MontereyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Curry / Lynn Johns vs Robin Inscho / Karolina Klarowicz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKirsten Forbush / Sandee Kozel vs Amy Gardner / Kristie McCormick6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRosa Thakkar / Dana Wagoner vs Kimberly DiStefano / Dayna Webre6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Nannette Staropoli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Dana Wagoner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Kirsten Forbush
published
4.24
Lynn Johns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Flora Rodriguez
published 4.5
4.14
Rebecca Tessitore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Sandee Kozel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Macey Tyll
published
3.92
Terry Dirr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Paige Radostits
published
3.76
3.70
Donna Curry
published 4
3.59
Rosa Thakkar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa McGillis
published
Sarah Guglielmo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nannette Staropoli + Dana Wagoner15360% games+0.5% vs expected
Terry Dirr + Nannette Staropoli134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Johns + Rebecca Tessitore404 matchesnot enough data
Rosa Thakkar + Flora Rodriguez033 matchesnot enough data
Sandee Kozel + Nannette Staropoli213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Tessitore + Kirsten Forbush213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nannette Staropoli
98W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Dana Wagoner
149W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.35
Kirsten Forbush
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Flora Rodriguez
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Rebecca Tessitore
67W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.14
4
Sandee Kozel
82W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Macey Tyll
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Terry Dirr
323W–169L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Paige Radostits
17W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Anne Marie Russell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Donna Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Rosa Thakkar
46W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Lisa McGillis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Guglielmo
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.