Teams

Prescott

Fall Adult Flexible Format Mixed doubles · Mixed doubles Flex NAZ

4 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · Mixed doubles Flex NAZ
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Embry Riddle000000
2Prescott000000
3Riggs0102421
4Bryer0231334
5Goldstock0333655
6Nicol0342760
7Perry054612104

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Madison Foley
published 4.5
Camden Fetty
published 4
3.60
Everest Hackerott
published
Francine Hackerott
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Madison Foley
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
Camden Fetty
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Everest Hackerott
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Francine Hackerott
52W–36L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.