Teams

A40 3.0M LT Fiedler

2022 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-12vs A40 3.0M NC BooherLost 04
L#1 DoublesGeoff Fiedler / John Clay vs Timothy Booher / Matthew Johnston4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSHENGYONG WANG vs Sunny Makey6-7, 1-4
L#2 DoublesJoe Paydock / Florencio Marquinez vs Douglas Snyder / Robert Timken0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristian Coughlan / Peter Culver vs Elbert Enrique / MICHAEL GIBSON1-6, 2-6
2022-06-28vs A40 3.0M MV BeebeWon 32
L#1 DoublesAlan Eng / Joe Paydock vs Robert Haught / Scott Limestoll4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSHENGYONG WANG vs Nicholas Fasola2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAmit Jain / Sanket Shah vs Michael Sreshta / David Frederick6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGeoff Fiedler / Ashish Sharma vs Ravi Krishnan / Kern Jolibois6-1, 6-2
W#4 DoublesNicolas Savelieff / Xiaofeng Wang vs Earl Beebe / Jeeho Chang6-0, 6-4
2022-05-31vs A40 3.0M PM SanchezWon 50
W#1 DoublesSanket Shah / Amit Jain vs John Richardson / Chad Wilson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGeoff Fiedler vs Andrew Chan6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJoe Paydock / Alan Eng vs Michael Kenny / Max Steiner6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAshish Sharma / Xiaofeng Wang vs William Farr / Ron Sanchez7-6, 6-4
W#4 DoublesChristian Coughlan / Peter Culver vs Tom Yoder / Brian Seitz6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A40&O 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
SHENGYONG WANG
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Geoff Fiedler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Alan Eng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Florencio Marquinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Ashish Sharma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Timothy Adkins
published
2.68
Amit Jain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Nicolas Savelieff
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Christian Coughlan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
Joe Paydock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Narendra Sahney
published
Peter Culver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Sanket Shah
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Hofer
published
Xiaofeng Wang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christian Coughlan + Peter Culver6258% games+4.3% vs expected
Sanket Shah + Amit Jain6347% games−6.5% vs expected
SHENGYONG WANG + Florencio Marquinez3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SHENGYONG WANG
28W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Geoff Fiedler
89W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Alan Eng
72W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Florencio Marquinez
42W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Ashish Sharma
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
Timothy Adkins
29W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amit Jain
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Nicolas Savelieff
27W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Christian Coughlan
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
Joe Paydock
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Narendra Sahney
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Culver
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sanket Shah
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Hofer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Xiaofeng Wang
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.