Teams

Arbor Greene - C. VanMeter

2024 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-20vs Avila - A. StaffordLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Butts / Rebecca Gaier vs Anne Stafford / Stacey Lee4-6, 6-7
2024-05-13vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY ISAAC / Rebecca Gaier vs Anne Marie Lennox / Jennifer Duglin5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-06vs Cheval Servivors - M. ChevalierWon 20
W#1 DoublesAMY ISAAC / Sandra Bell vs Vera Trayner / Allyson Goodart6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Kelley Coffey vs Charmaine Wynter Carpenter / Hanna Fang6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-29vs Van Dyke Farms - P. MooreWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Crystal Vanmeter vs Audrey Kessler / Kathleen Roberts6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDenys Hubbard vs Karalee Kulek-Luzey6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesSandra Bell / Denys Hubbard vs Hyun Kim / Pamela Gonzalez6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAMY ISAAC vs Katherine Grichnik6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Amy Butts vs Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk / Pamela Woodham6-0, 7-5
2024-04-15vs Grand Hampton - M. QuinonesWon 10
W#1 SinglesDenys Hubbard vs Claudia Chao6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Kelley Coffey vs Christy Schnell / Jan Sayad6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
AMY ISAAC
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Rebecca Gaier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Jiyoung Yoon
published
2.85
Crystal Vanmeter
published 3
2.82
Kelley Coffey
published
2.74
Sandra Bell
published
2.72
Carrie Lacy
published 3
2.71
Denys Hubbard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Amy Butts
published 3
2.57
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denys Hubbard + Rebecca Gaier11554% games−0.1% vs expected
Rebecca Gaier + AMY ISAAC121055% gamesnot enough data
Denys Hubbard + AMY ISAAC5060% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Coffey + Jiyoung Yoon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AMY ISAAC
107W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Rebecca Gaier
148W–84L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jiyoung Yoon
10W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Crystal Vanmeter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Kelley Coffey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Crystal Shanique Bethel
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Sandra Bell
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Carrie Lacy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Denys Hubbard
125W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Amy Butts
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Christine Sullivan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.