← TeamsSWW-GTC-Doane
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON
Scouting
Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
3.81
Roy Seemanusually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Corey Westusually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Kevin Nielsenusually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2023-03-11Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesKevin Nielsen / Corey West vs Chad Bemis / Kenji Yoshino6-1, 6-1
2023-03-03Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBhupinder Oberoi / Roy Seeman vs Sherif Awad / Winferd Baker6-2, 6-3
2023-02-26Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBhupinder Oberoi / Roy Seeman vs Chris Fynboe / Craig Robertson6-3, 6-3
2023-02-04Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoy Seeman / Randy Myers vs SON KIM / Jerry Kang6-4, 6-2
2023-01-28Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesBhupinder Oberoi / Roy Seeman vs Thomas Reber / John Shelton6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRandy Myers / Kevin Nielsen vs Craig Robertson / Jeff Walz6-2, 6-2
2023-01-21Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBhupinder Oberoi / Roy Seeman vs Travis Westfall / Mukund Soundararajan5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-01-08Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBhupinder Oberoi / Roy Seeman vs Ken Lieuw / Oliver Vicente6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.