Teams

Escambia/Whittenberger/40&Over3.5M

2024 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-16vs Hillman - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / James Richardson vs Robert Patterson / Jeffrey Henderson6-4, 6-2
2024-04-09vs Hillman - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / Mark Brabham vs Eric Stewart / Kirk Bradley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-26vs Hillman - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / Gregory Gill vs Andrew Hillman / Kirk Bradley6-7, 3-6
2024-03-12vs Hillman - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 SinglesGeorge Rials vs Alex Hyde-White6-4, 6-2
2024-03-05vs Hillman - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / Craig Abel vs Kirk Bradley / Eric Stewart2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Nick Farkas
published
3.50
George Rials
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Ed Souza
published
3.40
Gregory Gill
published
3.33
John Whittenberger
published
3.29
Craig Abel
published 3.5
Alex McCrory
published 3.5
3.18
Michael Ghiorso
published
3.15
Troy Gill
published
3.11
Mark Brabham
published
James Richardson
published
Jeter Binondo
published
Todd Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Abel + Gregory Gill4254% games+1.8% vs expected
Nick Farkas + Craig Abel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
George Rials
95W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Ed Souza
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Gregory Gill
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Craig Abel
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alex McCrory
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Ghiorso
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Troy Gill
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Mark Brabham
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
James Richardson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeter Binondo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Fisher
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.