Teams

Avonleigh (Ram Maguluri)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-16vs USTA Atlanta/Ashwin GowdaLost 23
L#1 DoublesSrikanth Reddy / SETH SENTHIL vs Bipin Krishna / Akhil Pai7-5, 2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKuldeep Gollamudi vs Dilip Dash2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesVivek Jaiswal / Vishnu Kouluri vs Suresh Palani / Saurabh Suneja6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlok Khemka / Nagu Tatikonda vs Kishore Kandalai / Santhosh Mysore6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesRam Maguluri / Karthik Gururaja Rao vs Deepak Jahagirdar / Imran Pasha Mohammad Abdul0-6, 1-6
2025-08-09vs Central Park (Hugh Pham)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesRajesh Ramanathapuram / Thirunarayanan Viswanathan vs Viet Manh Pham / Luke Huynh1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKuldeep Gollamudi vs Henry Dong4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesVivek Jaiswal / Vishnu Kouluri vs Choat Soviravong / Loc Nguyen7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRam Maguluri / Karthik Gururaja Rao vs Veera Eerni / Amit Malviya6-4, 6-2
W#4 DoublesSETH SENTHIL / Nagu Tatikonda vs HUGH PHAM / Chris Stovall6-2, 6-2
2025-07-26vs USTA Atlanta/Ashwin GowdaLost 14
W#1 DoublesVivek Jaiswal / SETH SENTHIL vs Sanchit Malhotra / Saurabh Suneja6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKuldeep Gollamudi vs Deepak Jahagirdar2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKarthik Gururaja Rao / Srikanth Reddy vs Sang Hwi Lee / Jemin Vora7-5, 4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlok Khemka / Ramkumar Sangameshwar vs Ashwin Gowda / Rahul Koul3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesRam Maguluri / Nagu Tatikonda vs Venumadhav Kotla / Suresh Palani6-3, 1-6, 4-6
2025-07-19vs Central Park (Hugh Pham)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesSrikanth Reddy / Vivek Jaiswal vs HUGH PHAM / Viet Manh Pham7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKuldeep Gollamudi vs Henry Dong3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSETH SENTHIL / Vishnu Kouluri vs Khiem Pham / Tony Pham6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeepak Reddy / Ramkumar Sangameshwar vs Choat Soviravong / Loc Nguyen2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesKarthik Gururaja Rao / Ram Maguluri vs Chris Stovall / Thai Le6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Vivek Jaiswal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Vishnu Kouluri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Srikanth Reddy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
SETH SENTHIL
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Deepak Reddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Karthik Gururaja Rao
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Nagu Tatikonda
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kuldeep Gollamudi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Ram Maguluri
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Ramkumar Sangameshwar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Alok Khemka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Gopi Manginani
published 3.5
2.89
Rajesh Ramanathapuram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thirunarayanan Viswanathan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vishnu Kouluri + Vivek Jaiswal6158% games+18.6% vs expected
SETH SENTHIL + Vivek Jaiswal4354% games+13.7% vs expected
SETH SENTHIL + Srikanth Reddy4451% games−1.3% vs expected
Karthik Gururaja Rao + Ram Maguluri3451% games−4.0% vs expected
Vivek Jaiswal + Ram Maguluri5256% gamesnot enough data
Ramkumar Sangameshwar + Deepak Reddy4250% gamesnot enough data
Vishnu Kouluri + Srikanth Reddy5155% gamesnot enough data
Rajesh Ramanathapuram + Karthik Gururaja Rao2340% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vivek Jaiswal
23W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Vishnu Kouluri
23W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Srikanth Reddy
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
SETH SENTHIL
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Deepak Reddy
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Karthik Gururaja Rao
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Nagu Tatikonda
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kuldeep Gollamudi
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Ram Maguluri
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Ramkumar Sangameshwar
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Alok Khemka
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gopi Manginani
0W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Rajesh Ramanathapuram
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.89
Thirunarayanan Viswanathan
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Viswanathan Shanmugasundaram
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.