Teams

RTeat (WSRC)

2024 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Sat PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-20vs SHuff (Olde Providence)Split 11
L#1 DoublesErik Witten / Richard Teat vs Creighton Baldwin / Steve Huff1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJim Waud / Michael Terry vs John Roland / Rohn Wagoner6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-13vs SHuff (Olde Providence)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJim Waud / Michael Terry vs John Roland / Gary Stern6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-06vs SHuff (Olde Providence)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTom Traub / Jim Waud vs Steve Huff / Creighton Baldwin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Terry / Richard Teat vs Tim Scott / Richard Pfordte4-6, 1-6
2024-03-16vs SHuff (Olde Providence)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Seasely / Steven Todd vs Tim Scott / Steve Huff1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTom Traub / Jim Waud vs Gary Stern / John Roland7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tom Traub
published
3.87
Erik Witten
published 4
3.82
Richard Teat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Kevin Seasely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jerry Holman
published
3.63
Eric Martin
published 4
3.59
Larry McCorkle
published
3.52
Chin Lin
published 3.5
3.51
Jim Waud
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Steven Todd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Teat + Larry McCorkle224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Teat + Steven Todd314 matchesnot enough data
Eric Martin + Larry McCorkle123 matchesnot enough data
Tom Traub + Kevin Seasely213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Traub
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Erik Witten
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Richard Teat
91W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Kevin Seasely
48W–87L career · 1 line in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Jerry Holman
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Eric Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
Larry McCorkle
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Chin Lin
83W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.52
4
Jim Waud
33W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Steven Todd
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.