Teams

CP-Baseline Bros-Tahmasebie

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.77 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs NTC-SMACK-ReddyLost 13
L#1 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Fred Wurden vs J Michael Diaz / Geoff Harrison2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBin Wang vs Alen Chen7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKent Lundgren / Chandra Srinivasan vs Peter Gregory / Tom Pierson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFarhad Ghassemi / Justin Marquart vs Eric Steinwinder / Pavel Dolezel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-06vs NWW-WSC-SainiLost 04
L#1 DoublesRyan Caldeiro / LUN CHEN vs Manu Vij / Atul Shah3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAki Shirahama vs Alex Chen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Fred Wurden vs Michael Joung / Matthew Ip2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKent Lundgren / Chandra Srinivasan vs Prasad Gopalkrishnan / Vinod Kurpad0-6, 1-6
2026-02-22vs EDG-HiraiLost 04
L#1 DoublesRyan Caldeiro / Girish Patwardhan vs Andrew Royes / Jason Hsu2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBin Wang vs Bryan Cossette4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJustin Marquart / Joe van Zyl vs Manato Hirai / Howard Tu4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJim Muenz / Farhad Ghassemi vs Brian Namba / Jason Rungsigul0-6, 1-6
2026-02-15vs MI-ParcelLost 04
L#1 DoublesFred Wurden / Kent Lundgren vs Andrew Parcel / Aaron Thomas4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesArjang Tahmasebie vs JON COOMBES6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJustin Marquart / Joe van Zyl vs Mark Peterson / Grant Pomering3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaushik Purohit / Chandra Srinivasan vs Christopher Cahoon / Eric Elefson4-6, 3-6
2026-01-24vs PL-AT-IN-UM-EscalonaLost 12
W#1 DoublesFred Wurden / Girish Patwardhan vs Joe Stanley / Patrick Haluptzok6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesArjang Tahmasebie vs Balbir Singh2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Caldeiro / Kent Lundgren vs Srish Sawkar / Badrinath Vengalathur6-7, 3-6
2026-01-16vs CAC/SL-SchmidtLost 04
L#1 DoublesCarlos Ferreira / Ryan Caldeiro vs Will Blanchard / Lohit Verma3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChandra Srinivasan vs Rohit Sharma2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Kent Lundgren vs Kevin Schmidt / Zeke Bradley2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Marquart / Joe van Zyl vs Chad Masche / David Bibbs1-6, 4-6
2026-01-09vs BETC-HoangLost 13
L#1 DoublesFred Wurden / Ryan Caldeiro vs Anh Tuan Hoang / Binh Nguyen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAki Shirahama vs Daniel Fan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFarhad Ghassemi / Justin Marquart vs Len Henzke / Aaron Haffner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArjang Tahmasebie / Chandra Srinivasan vs Kevin Vu / Chuong Do1-6, 0-6
2026-01-02vs EDG-HiraiLost 13
L#1 DoublesRyan Caldeiro / LUN CHEN vs Bryan Cossette / Song Ko4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBin Wang vs Jason Hsu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChandra Srinivasan / Farhad Ghassemi vs Barry Nishimura / David Weibel0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJim Muenz / Kaushik Purohit vs Kevin Larson / Jerry Rey Chai1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Bin Wang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Carlos Ferreira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Girish Patwardhan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Aki Shirahama
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
LUN CHEN
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Fred Wurden
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Joe van Zyl
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.44
Kent Lundgren
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Ryan Caldeiro
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.39
Farhad Ghassemi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Justin Marquart
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Arjang Tahmasebie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Chandra Srinivasan
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.23
Kaushik Purohit
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Jim Muenz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chandra Srinivasan + Kaushik Purohit2444% games+0.7% vs expected
Justin Marquart + Joe van Zyl4350% games−0.3% vs expected
Fred Wurden + Girish Patwardhan224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Caldeiro + Fred Wurden033 matchesnot enough data
Jim Muenz + Kaushik Purohit033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bin Wang
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Carlos Ferreira
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Girish Patwardhan
66W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Aki Shirahama
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
LUN CHEN
22W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Fred Wurden
73W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Joe van Zyl
102W–41L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kent Lundgren
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
4
Ryan Caldeiro
23W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Farhad Ghassemi
80W–65L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Justin Marquart
108W–84L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
4
Arjang Tahmasebie
43W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.32
3.5
Chandra Srinivasan
65W–93L career · 13 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kaushik Purohit
82W–65L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jim Muenz
46W–65L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.