Teams

QRRC-Stevens

2026 OH OV SUMMER Mixed 40&O Dayton · 2026 MXD 40&O 8.0 Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-23vs SRTC-SmithWon 20
W#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Rachel Tritz vs Jonathan Westfall / Tammy Figueroa6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhilip Pierce / Kristin Taphorn vs David Ehlers / Christy Smith7-5, 6-2
2026-08-16vs QRRC-BurkleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Taphorn / Steven Jain vs Becky Dye / Gopal Bhat3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKathy Bleidorn / Roy Stevens vs Jessica Shively / Jonathan Rudy1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-19vs KTC-AndersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Kathy Bleidorn vs Jessica Anderson / SONU Singh1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRoy Stevens / Kristin Taphorn vs SCOTT WELDE / TOMOKO WELDE2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-12vs KTC-WeaverWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristin Taphorn / Roy Stevens vs Amanda Schuler / Matt Clouse4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Jain / Jennifer Wu vs Jayme Soulati / Matthew Cary0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacob Loeffelholz / Kathy Bleidorn vs Karen Weaver / Kevin Weaver6-2, 7-5
2026-06-14vs KTC-AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Rachael Avers vs Cam Woliver / Carolyn Smith6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGreg Haack / Jennifer Wu vs SCOTT WELDE / TOMOKO WELDE7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRoy Stevens / Michelle Henley vs Stephen Ward / Namchi Le4-6, 3-6
2026-06-07vs SRTC-SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Jain / Kathy Bleidorn vs Jonathan Westfall / Tayler Blake1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Loeffelholz / Rachael Avers vs Rajeev Goel / Tammy Figueroa3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesGreg Haack / Rachel Tritz vs David Ehlers / Christy Smith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-31vs KTC-WeaverLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Kathy Bleidorn vs Matt Clouse / Amanda Schuler4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Jain / Michelle Henley vs Jayme Soulati / Brooks Compton6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPhilip Pierce / Jennifer Wu vs Kevin Weaver / Noreen Beiersdorfer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 MXD 40&O 8.0 Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SRTC-Smith5213821190
2QRRC-Stevens2571432234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Darrin Heinz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Greg Haack
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Kristin Taphorn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Philip Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.64
Steven Jain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Jacob Loeffelholz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Jennifer Wu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Rachel Tritz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Kathy Bleidorn
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Rachael Avers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Roy Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Rick Schaefer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Zina Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Henley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Stevens + Kathy Bleidorn1634% games+4.1% vs expected
Darrin Heinz + Kathy Bleidorn3547% games+3.8% vs expected
Kristin Taphorn + Roy Stevens4444% games−3.0% vs expected
Jacob Loeffelholz + Rachael Avers5747% games−3.9% vs expected
Roy Stevens + Michelle Henley0529% gamesnot enough data
Roy Stevens + Zina Williams0539% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Taphorn + Philip Pierce314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Bleidorn + Philip Pierce044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Darrin Heinz
77W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.43
4
Greg Haack
152W–93L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Kristin Taphorn
161W–145L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Philip Pierce
62W–72L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Steven Jain
41W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Jacob Loeffelholz
49W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Wu
210W–144L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Rachel Tritz
122W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kathy Bleidorn
136W–152L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Rachael Avers
97W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
Roy Stevens
79W–135L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Rick Schaefer
20W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Zina Williams
101W–155L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
Michelle Henley
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.