Teams

LWR Liquid Ranchers

2026 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer · 8.5 W Thursday

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-20vs Payne Park WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Megan McAloon vs Michele Rose / Melissa Caldwell3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Gina Hagopian vs Sally Alford / Kara Beene2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Martina Kralickova vs Mary Wilson / Beth Robinson1-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs Wild Blue Wild CardsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllyson Hoffman / Megan McAloon vs Annmarie Curle / Sarah Anne Mcdonald6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Karen Huffman / Kim Reiser3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Peggy Crotty / Sheila Engert4-6, 3-6
2026-08-06vs Plantation Rock LobstersLost 12
W#1 DoublesMegan McAloon / Kim Eck vs Ana Areosa / Maureen Thomas6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Christy Smith / Susan Gammon6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Handel / Diana Stadelnikas vs Janet Kramer / Beth Costa6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-23vs LBK Public SmashersWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Elizabeth Green vs Cindy Fancher / Donna Hannigan6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Christine Handel vs Dorene Seider / Machelle Moody6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKim Eck / Karen Nicholson vs Dana Slackman / Susan King1-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs Payne Park WilsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan McAloon / Allyson Hoffman vs Mary Wilson / Carrie Carretta6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Elizabeth Green vs Kara Beene / Sally Alford6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Nicholson / Diana Stadelnikas vs Tami Dalto / Melissa Caldwell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Wild Blue Wild CardsLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Green / Megan McAloon vs Kim Reiser / Sarah Anne Mcdonald5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Nicholson / Nia Esposito vs Sue Silberbusch / Kathryn Paige Ciano2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Martina Kralickova vs Kathy Rain / Tambra Ford6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-02vs Plantation Rock LobstersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan McAloon / Allyson Hoffman vs Christy Smith / Marjorie Petruccelli6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGina Hagopian / Carol Frazier vs Ana Areosa / Susan Gammon6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Lynn Deuitch / Maureen Thomas6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
4.33
Allyson Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.02
Kim Eck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.99
Christine Handel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Megan McAloon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Nia Esposito
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Natalie Bloch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Gina Hagopian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Lauren Feingold Navas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Martina Kralickova
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Karen Spiegel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Karen Nicholson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Elizabeth Green
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Feingold Navas + Martina Kralickova12953% games+10.9% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Natalie Bloch8457% games+9.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+6.6% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Nia Esposito18955% games+5.4% vs expected
Gina Hagopian + Megan McAloon9157% games+5.4% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Christine Handel6163% games+4.5% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Megan McAloon5257% games+4.0% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Martina Kralickova7353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.51
4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
4
Kim Eck
56W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Christine Handel
26W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Megan McAloon
137W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Nia Esposito
154W–82L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Natalie Bloch
57W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Gina Hagopian
70W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Martina Kralickova
91W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.