Teams

BP ORANGE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 4.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-27vs LTC-M GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeg Staebell / Andrea Philleo vs Alli Berry / Lauren Perry2-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs BP GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Meg Staebell vs Mary Brennan / Joy Herrin2-6, 2-6
2024-08-13vs LTC-D TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Talia Cioth vs Orit Ostrowiak / Jenna Marvin2-6, 2-6
2024-07-30vs SS-LGT PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeg Staebell / Talia Cioth vs Amanda Wootton / Kristin Danford6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Morgan Cox vs Leigh Hardin / Megan Melucci4-6, 2-6
2024-07-23vs LTC-M GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Meg Staebell vs Denise Belk / Taryn Fleming1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Talia Cioth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Charlotte Rhoad
published 4.5
4.18
Meg Staebell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Denise Hernandez
published 4.5
4.08
Andrea Philleo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Christi Valicenti
published 4.5
3.94
Yukiko Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Mary Nelson
published
3.60
Morgan Cox
published
Irene Arguelles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Philleo + Talia Cioth4644% games−5.7% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Meg Staebell2442% games−6.1% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Irene Arguelles3745% games−8.8% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−16.1% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Irene Arguelles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Talia Cioth
74W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Charlotte Rhoad
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Meg Staebell
71W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Denise Hernandez
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Christi Valicenti
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mary Nelson
29W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Morgan Cox
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Irene Arguelles
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.