Teams

WNCL Young (Creekside)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2024 · 55 & O 4.0 women Sat morning

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-27vs WNCC Bull (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSallie LaChance / Marie Cowan vs Cindy Bull / Tracy McKenna0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Hunt / Lisa Boller vs Mary B Wilder / Kelly Loisel3-6, 1-3
2024-04-20vs WNCS Corley (ARC-S)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Hunt / Lisa Boller vs Amy Gaston / Lynne Weinrib7-5, 6-4
2024-04-14vs WNCK Kneier (Aston Park)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAngie Rardin / Lisa Boller vs Nancy Pryately / Jodi Shainberg1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-13vs WNCK Kneier (Aston Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Hunt / Lisa Boller vs Jodi Shainberg / Nancy Pryately2-6, 3-6
2024-04-06vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Boller / Lisa Young vs Brenda Cook / Amelia Duernberger6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-23vs WNCC Bull (HRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Marie Cowan vs Cindy Bull / Janet Sweezey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Davidson / Lisa Boller vs Vickie Massey / Susan Flynn3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & O 4.0 women Sat morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Theresa Hash
published
3.57
Sallie LaChance
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Julia Hunt
published
3.33
Bedford Lally
published 3.5
3.31
Cindy Hile
published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Boller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Donna Davidson
published
3.22
Marie Cowan
published
3.13
Angie Rardin
published 3.5
Gaylord Chambers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bedford Lally + Julia Hunt404 matchesnot enough data
Julia Hunt + Donna Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Hash
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Sallie LaChance
137W–131L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Julia Hunt
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Bedford Lally
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Lisa Boller
74W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Donna Davidson
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Marie Cowan
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angie Rardin
15W–29L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Gaylord Chambers
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.