Teams

PAM WHITTINGTON

2025 SETX 18 & Over Mixed · 6.0 MIX

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-28vs APRIL FOXWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Mckinney / Stephen Schlett vs Jorge Guadarrama / Hadley Morgan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Hayes / Charles Perez vs Kyley Israel / Alec Hamilton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrant Boyle / Lori Moore vs Donna Garcia / David Garcia7-5, 6-0
2025-07-14vs Lord of the StringsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Hayes / Brayden Songe vs Karen Fertitta / Rafael Garcia3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Mckinney / Ashley Stone vs Kasey Foster / Welton Jones3-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs APRIL FOXWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrayden Songe / Laura Hayes vs April Fox / Randall Richard0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Perez / Lori Moore vs Jorge Guadarrama / Ericka Richard1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Stone / Nicole Mckinney vs Donna Garcia / David Garcia7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-09vs Lord of the StringsLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Hayes / Stephen Schlett vs Ashton Smith / Ronnie Thakkar5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole van Houten / Lester Moore vs He Huang / Karen Fertitta0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrant Boyle / Pam Whittington vs Welton Jones / Kasey Foster0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MIX have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Lori Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Laura Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Charles Perez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brant Boyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Pam Whittington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brayden Songe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lester Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Mckinney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole van Houten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Moore
39W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Laura Hayes
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Charles Perez
4W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brant Boyle
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Whittington
5W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Brayden Songe
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lester Moore
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Mckinney
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole van Houten
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.