Teams

Wood Ranch Hitmen

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-14vs Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Dan Crane / Kevin Humfreville6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Adam Adair / Jeffrey Tseng6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-01vs PelicansWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Chris Sanchez / Erik Bars6-1, 7-5
2025-10-26vs Mission Oaks DragonsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Alireza Rezaie / David Dewing6-1, 6-0
2025-10-18vs Dream TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Edwin Ramirez / Yung Yi6-4, 6-2
2025-10-12vs Chief PeakLost 01
L#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Greg Doss / Robert Freeman4-6, 6-7
2025-10-04vs North Ranch RenegadesWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarry Mapanda / Jeremy Tuite vs Jordan Riessen / Andrew Goldenberg6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Harry Mapanda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Jeremy Tuite
published
3.88
Tyler Jensen
published
3.84
Gabriel Duarte
published
3.84
Jonathan Monteverdi
published
3.84
Kristopher Sherrill
published
3.83
Dave Faciana
published 4
3.81
Cory Rodrigues
published 4
3.81
James Coe
published
3.80
Warren Bachtel
published
3.76
Kenny Koh
published
3.76
Mark Lipsky
published
Jeff Sutterman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristopher Sherrill + Mark Lipsky5055% gamesnot enough data
Dave Faciana + Mark Lipsky314 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Jensen + James Coe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Harry Mapanda
130W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jeremy Tuite
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Tyler Jensen
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Gabriel Duarte
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Jonathan Monteverdi
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Kristopher Sherrill
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Dave Faciana
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Cory Rodrigues
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
James Coe
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Warren Bachtel
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Kenny Koh
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Mark Lipsky
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Jeff Sutterman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.