Teams

MCL HOCHSTER/HULSEY

2025 FW Ladies 65 & Over · 6.0 FW LADIES

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-09vs SOAKS ROTHERMELWon 21
L#1 DoublesDana Rosenstein / Christi Handy vs Betsy Lacy / Mary Ann Littleton4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Ferguson / Jessie Butler vs Debbie Abraham / Marsha Rothermel7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLINDA FEATHERSTONE / Janet Kasper vs Lorane Rea / Anita Gatchel6-2, 6-2
2025-04-28vs TCU CALDER/WEISLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Mills / Jessie Butler vs Jo Anne Golaz / Petra Townsend6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Hulsey / Christi Handy vs Pet Guerra / Della Weis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLINDA FEATHERSTONE / Dana Rosenstein vs Mary Rogers / Patti Hebson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-21vs ATC BYARSLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Hulsey / Christi Handy vs Jane Schmidt / Michelle Fagan1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Ferguson / Dana Rosenstein vs Gayle Howington / Carole Green5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Kasper / LINDA FEATHERSTONE vs Nancy Granby / Christina Clayton4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-07vs SOAKS ROTHERMELLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Rosenstein / Christi Handy vs Pamela Williams / Bonnie Sudderth6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Ferguson / Lisa Mills vs Angie Eddins / Mary Ann Littleton2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Kasper / LINDA FEATHERSTONE vs Cory Coons / Debbie Abraham6-7, 5-7
2025-03-24vs TCU CALDER/WEISWon 21
L#1 DoublesJudy Hulsey / Dana Rosenstein vs Jo Anne Golaz / Petra Townsend5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Ferguson / Linda Hochster vs Pet Guerra / Joyce Kain6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLINDA FEATHERSTONE / Janet Kasper vs Mary Rogers / Patti Hebson6-4, 6-4
2025-03-17vs ATC BYARSLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristi Handy / Linda Hochster vs Michelle Fagan / Jane Schmidt1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Ferguson / LINDA FEATHERSTONE vs Lynne Byars / Gayle Howington2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Mills / Jessie Butler vs Joan Cauley / Mary Buffington2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 FW LADIES have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Linda Hochster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Christi Handy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Jessie Butler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Judy Hulsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Dana Rosenstein
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Anne Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
LINDA FEATHERSTONE
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Janet Kasper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Hochster + Christi Handy1938% gamesnot enough data
Judy Hulsey + Christi Handy4645% gamesnot enough data
LINDA FEATHERSTONE + Janet Kasper3445% gamesnot enough data
Linda Hochster + Anne Ferguson3343% gamesnot enough data
Jessie Butler + LINDA FEATHERSTONE2343% gamesnot enough data
Jessie Butler + Anne Ferguson1441% gamesnot enough data
Judy Hulsey + Janet Kasper2347% gamesnot enough data
Dana Rosenstein + LINDA FEATHERSTONE134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Hochster
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christi Handy
8W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jessie Butler
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Judy Hulsey
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Dana Rosenstein
5W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Anne Ferguson
8W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
LINDA FEATHERSTONE
10W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Janet Kasper
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.