Teams

ROLLING HILLS CW6.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
3.80
Laura Hoppe
published
3.43
Stacey Clemenceau
published
3.34
Elysia Scott
published 3.5
3.31
Alaina Thompson
published 3.5
3.26
Care Pittman
published 3.5
3.26
Jonell Langley
published
3.23
Kristine Banton
published
3.17
Theresa Odisio
published
3.16
Tricia Hulsey
published 3.5
2.86
DARCY JEWETT
published 3
2.80
Carly Daniels
published 3
2.77
Julie Jacobson
published
2.47
Melinda Mullin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elysia Scott + Alaina Thompson2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ariadile Goes Mariano
15W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Laura Hoppe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.80
Stacey Clemenceau
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Elysia Scott
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Alaina Thompson
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Care Pittman
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Jonell Langley
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Kristine Banton
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Theresa Odisio
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Tricia Hulsey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
DARCY JEWETT
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Carly Daniels
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Julie Jacobson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Marie McCormick
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Mullin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.