Teams

Burgess, Randy

2023 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25vs Bicknell, BradLost 04
L#1 DoublesJames Allman / Todd Schemmel vs Mike Klender / Jim Hawkins2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJames Merwald vs Charlie Murphy1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Burgess / Tom Rosewicz vs Andrew Wimmer / Eric Wimmer1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Faught / Brad Jones vs JOHN CRAIG / John Nestor4-6, 3-6
2023-03-04vs Granger, NathanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRandy Burgess / James Allman vs David Coleman / Roy True6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTodd Schemmel vs Steve Boos6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Jones / Marcus Edwards vs Gilbert Self / Tim Askew2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Nyemaster / Andrew Plungkhen vs Kowin Casey / ANDRE CURIEL2-6, 3-6
2023-02-25vs Lyon, ChrisLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Rosewicz / James Merwald vs Shashi Bhat / David Henderson5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAndrew Plungkhen vs Ranjit Ramdas0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRandy Burgess / Peter Riggs vs Karthick Pattabiraman / Andy Phillips7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-18vs HOA/Wohlers/40&Over3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesJames Merwald / John Jacobs vs Mark McDonald / Michael Faulconer3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTom Rosewicz vs Jaik Kim5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Faught / Todd Schemmel vs Luis Gonzalez Saiz / Charles Davis1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrad Jones / Jon Nyemaster vs Robert Beltrame / Charles Wohlers2-6, 0-6
2023-02-11vs Madhira, UmaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRandy Burgess / Brad Jones vs David Mohan / Asim Ulusarac7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPeter Riggs vs Tony Prettejohn0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Plungkhen / Todd Schemmel vs Uma Madhira / Del Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Nyemaster / Marcus Edwards vs Srinivas Musti / Juergen Massey3-6, 2-2
2023-02-04vs Snyder, PaulLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Burgess / James Allman vs Daniel Alvarez / Richard Bierman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTom Rosewicz / Brad Jones vs Robert Tanenbaum / Martin Rankin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Plungkhen / Todd Schemmel vs John Schlueter / Paul Snyder6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-28vs Rayl, DavidWon 21
L#1 SinglesJames Merwald vs SUKU Kuriakose3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTom Rosewicz / Randy Burgess vs Ronald Jones / Tom Fangman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTodd Schemmel / John Faught vs Timothy Smith / KIRK COLLIER6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2023-01-22vs Long, ChrisLost 04
L#1 DoublesJames Allman / Tom Rosewicz vs Ronald Chen / Bryan Zingg1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRandy Burgess vs Robert Halksworth1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Jones / Andrew Plungkhen vs Chris Long / Chan Kim2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Schemmel / Jon Nyemaster vs BIll BLACK / David French2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Wohlers/40&Over3.5M7126615216
2Bicknell, Brad5323921235
3Lyon, Chris35122043312
4Madhira, Uma3592347315
5Burgess, Randy1792353352
6Rayl, David0872552339

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Todd Schemmel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Randy Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.26
Andrew Plungkhen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Brad Jones
published 3.5
James Merwald
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Tom Rosewicz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
James Allman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Faught
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jon Nyemaster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marcus Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Burgess + Todd Schemmel7268% games+14.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Schemmel
43W–19L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Randy Burgess
77W–69L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Andrew Plungkhen
33W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Brad Jones
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
James Merwald
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Rosewicz
13W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
James Allman
26W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Faught
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Nyemaster
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcus Edwards
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Riggs
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.