Teams

Fred Wells Farley 11:00

2021 Woman's Daytime Singles · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jackson Farley
published 4.5
3.41
Susan Volin
published
3.39
Stephanie Dean
published
3.19
2.76
Wendi Kelly
published
2.74
Kristin Dyrhaug
published
2.73
Katy Petersen
published
2.65
Sue Ensign
published
Mary McRaith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jackson Farley
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Volin
26W–24L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
3.41
Stephanie Dean
27W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Charlotte Hanley-Jacobson
9W–16L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
Wendi Kelly
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
Kristin Dyrhaug
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
Katy Petersen
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Sue Ensign
3W–21L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Mary McRaith
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.