Teams

BRTC:Bass River:Arkins

2025 EMA Adult 65 & Over Women · 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs CED:Cedardale;DixonWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dick / Diana Blitz vs Catharine Hayes / Georgia Cady6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Munroe / Sandra Duryea vs Catherine DeSalvo / Sally Magner6-2, 6-1
2025-07-24vs CED:Cedardale;DixonWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dick / Karin Conroy vs Catharine Hayes / Catherine DeSalvo6-7, 5-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Blitz / Abbe Smith vs Sally Magner / Maria Blakslee7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatherine Arkins / Mary Soliozy vs Peggy Dixon / Penny Pounder4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-17vs CED:Cedardale;DixonLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Arkins / Sandra Duryea vs Catharine Hayes / Catherine DeSalvo4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Munroe / Mary Soliozy vs Robin Doherty / Patricia Ehlbeck6-7, 2-3
2025-06-26vs CED:Cedardale;DixonWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dick / Sandra Duryea vs Catherine DeSalvo / Catharine Hayes4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Soliozy / Karin Conroy vs Maria Blakslee / Patricia Ehlbeck6-4, 4-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Munroe / Lorraine Salter vs Sally Magner / Elaine Stilianos6-4, 4-2
2025-06-19vs CED:Cedardale;DixonWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dick / Sandra Duryea vs Catharine Hayes / Elaine Stilianos6-3, 6-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Arkins / Diana Blitz vs Robin Doherty / Sally Magner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Munroe / Mary Soliozy vs Peggy Dixon / Penny Pounder6-4, 3-5, 1-0
2025-06-12vs CED:Cedardale;DixonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Arkins / Elizabeth Dick vs Patricia Ehlbeck / Elaine Stilianos3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLorraine Salter / Elizabeth Munroe vs Sandra Dick / Georgia Cady5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Blitz / Abbe Smith vs Catharine Hayes / Catherine DeSalvo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Diana Blitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Catherine Arkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Lorraine Salter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Abbe Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Karin Conroy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Mary Soliozy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Elizabeth Dick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Munroe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sandra Duryea
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dick + Catherine Arkins10556% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Blitz
47W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Catherine Arkins
35W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Lorraine Salter
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Abbe Smith
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karin Conroy
222W–150L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Mary Soliozy
21W–22L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Elizabeth Dick
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Munroe
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Duryea
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.