Teams

Chastain

2025 Sequoyah Southern Combo 18 & Over - Winter '25 · Women 5.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-02-23vs Sequoyah/Vivian WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Patch / Mary Sheppard vs Brooke Childs / Meredith Banta3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCandace Mason / Jennifer Massey vs Pam Chapman / Cami Marcus4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCelina Locke / Pam Mills vs Janelle Williams / Vivian White5-7, 3-6
2025-02-17vs Sequoyah/Ashlyn ThorntonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Venkatesu / April Chastain vs Jewel Akpose / Jennifer Kerce5-7, 4-6
2025-02-16vs Sequoyah/Vivian WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Chastain / Sarah Arthur vs Sandra Copeland / Ann Carroll5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Kelm / Mary Sheppard vs Janelle Williams / Crissy Davis4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCelina Locke / Jennifer Kerce vs Elizabeth Goble / Lisa Goble3-6, 4-6
2025-02-09vs Sequoyah/Vivian WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Massey / Sarah Arthur vs Alyssa Childs / Crissy Davis1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Patch / Pam Mills vs Pam Chapman / Cami Marcus3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCelina Locke / Mary Sheppard vs Sandra Copeland / Nina Banks1-6, 2-6
2025-02-03vs Sequoyah/Ashlyn ThorntonLost 01
L#3 DoublesPriscilla Fonseca / Julie Graves vs Brittany Carroll / Sarah Arthur1-6, 2-6
2025-02-02vs Sequoyah/Vivian WhiteLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelm / Candace Mason vs Brooke Childs / Crissy Davis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesApril Chastain / Jennifer Kerce vs Sandra Copeland / Vivian White4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCelina Locke / Ashlyn Thornton vs Elizabeth Goble / Lisa Goble6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-29vs Sequoyah/Ashlyn ThorntonLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Maynard / Priscilla Fonseca vs MacI Mills / Jennifer Kerce4-6, 6-7
2025-01-26vs Sequoyah/Vivian WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Watson / April Chastain vs Ann Carroll / Alyssa Childs0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Fonseca / Lori Patch vs Cami Marcus / Brooke Childs0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Sheppard / Celina Locke vs Meredith Banta / Janelle Williams3-6, 4-6
2025-01-19vs Sequoyah/Vivian WhiteLost 12
W#1 DoublesApril Chastain / Ashlyn Thornton vs Pam Chapman / Ann Carroll6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Patch / Jennifer Kerce vs Alyssa Childs / Crissy Davis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Kelm / Pam Mills vs Janelle Williams / Nina Banks3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-13vs Sequoyah/Ashlyn ThorntonLost 01
L#2 DoublesApril Chastain / Mendi Holsomback vs Jennifer Kerce / Sarah Arthur2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ashlyn Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Candace Mason
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Jennifer Kerce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.87
Sarah Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Pam Mills
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Lori Patch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Samantha Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
April Chastain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
Elizabeth Kelm
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Celina Locke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Jennifer Massey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Sheppard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Priscilla Fonseca
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashlyn Thornton + Candace Mason6084% games+17.7% vs expected
Ashlyn Thornton + Pam Mills6074% games+2.7% vs expected
Ashlyn Thornton + Jennifer Kerce6070% games−2.6% vs expected
Pam Mills + Jennifer Kerce10753% games−5.7% vs expected
Pam Mills + Candace Mason5065% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Massey + Celina Locke044 matchesnot enough data
Pam Mills + Celina Locke044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kerce + Sarah Arthur404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashlyn Thornton
87W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Candace Mason
70W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Jennifer Kerce
60W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sarah Arthur
38W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Pam Mills
53W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Lori Patch
51W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.66
Samantha Watson
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
April Chastain
17W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Elizabeth Kelm
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Celina Locke
11W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jennifer Massey
10W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Mary Sheppard
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Fonseca
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.