Teams

DPatel (Blakeney)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Sun PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-05vs RCazares (Palisades)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDevesh Patel / Phillip Osborne vs Don Nelson / Brian Hatfield6-3, 6-3
2022-04-24vs KKrzywosz (LifeTime)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRicky Marks / David Bartholomew vs Kevin Zhang / TIEFENG ZHANG6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDevesh Patel / Phillip Osborne vs Kenji Krzywosz / Jeff Morris6-1, 6-1
2022-04-10vs DBrantmeyer (PLCC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRicky Marks / David Bartholomew vs Vince Quinn / Mike Ferguson6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhillip Osborne / Jeffrey Brockman vs Dan Brantmeyer / Francis Pate4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-03vs TYoung/Miller (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPhillip Osborne / David Bartholomew vs Ralph Martinez / Martin Iles1-6, 2-6
2022-03-27vs RGum/King (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRicky Marks / Hakan Pehrsson vs Francisco Rivera / Jeff Peters6-3, 6-2
2022-03-20vs DThompson (Olde Providence)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRicky Marks / Devesh Patel vs Duncan Thompson / Marc Parker6-2, 6-2
2022-03-17vs MSansotta (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesRicky Marks / Hakan Pehrsson vs Kevin Seasely / Tom McQueen6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJackson Walker / Phillip Osborne vs Daniel Marthinsen / Jerry Holman3-6, 4-6
2022-03-12vs GRhodes (Southampton)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDevesh Patel / Ricky Marks vs Brian Lamke / Chris Pridnia6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Sun PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Hector Tovar
published 4
3.82
Hakan Pehrsson
published 4
3.80
Ricky Marks
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.78
Bradford Hood
published 4
3.74
Devesh Patel
published 4
3.63
Eric Martin
published 4
3.05
Phillip Osborne
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ricky Marks + Devesh Patel13359% games+2.8% vs expected
Ricky Marks + Hector Tovar224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hector Tovar
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Hakan Pehrsson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Ricky Marks
113W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bradford Hood
50W–53L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Devesh Patel
28W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Eric Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Phillip Osborne
37W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.