Teams

KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONE

2026 USTA FALL 18 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

1 player · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings18 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/HARRIS/MASON000000
2KY/LOU/THOMAS/BLACK000000
3KY/LOU/MENTING/BAGLEY000000
4KY/LOU/BAYLON/HELFRICH000000
5KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONE000000
6KY/LOU/FOUNTAIN000000
7KY/LOU/WILSON/FARRIS000000
8KY/LOU/HAWKINS000000
9KY/LOU/RILEY000000
10KY/LOU/WILLIAMS/JONES000000
11KY/LOU/LANE000000
12KY/LOU/ROBERTS/GORMAN (NPC)000000
13KY/LOU/GORMAN/ROBERTS (NPC)000000
14KY/LOU/REISING000000
15KY/LOU/CROPPER000000
16KY/LOU/WILLIAMS000000
17KY/LOU/STEEN000000
18FRENCH/WILSON000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Joanna Agin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanna Agin
46W–33L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.