Teams

CStaton (Park Road)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-03vs WParker (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Richards / Janna Huggins vs Laine Parker Horvath / Lina Clarke1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sopel / Michelle Fontana vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Jennifer Anderson1-6, 5-7
2022-04-26vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Richards / Janna Huggins vs Samantha Danesis / Laura Grigoleit4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-19vs AKaiser (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Chillag / Jennifer Sopel vs Jordan Bowers / Jessica Varn7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristine Richards / Janna Huggins vs Tessa Radziej / Megan Hunter0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-12vs JGardiner (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesHannah Chillag / Jennifer Sopel vs Barbara Salvucci / Tylee Kessler4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanna Huggins / Michelle Fontana vs Suzy Johnson / Kathryn Karakus7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDiofra Azucenas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-29vs WParker (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDiana West / Jennifer Sopel vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Jennifer Antoszyk1-6, 3-6
2022-03-10vs JGardiner (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJanna Huggins / C E Swanson vs Kristen Montgomery / Stephanie Ladley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Hannah Chillag
published 4.5
4.29
Diofra Azucenas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.15
Jennifer Sopel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.07
Christine Richards
published 4.5
3.79
Janna Huggins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Michelle Fontana
published
C E Swanson
published 4
Christine Kessel
published 4
3.70
Brantlee Green
published 4
3.64
Cynthia Staton
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana West + Hannah Chillag134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hannah Chillag
21W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Diofra Azucenas
99W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Diana West
34W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
Jennifer Sopel
76W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Christine Richards
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Janna Huggins
64W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Michelle Fontana
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
C E Swanson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christine Kessel
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Brantlee Green
57W–48L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cynthia Staton
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.