Teams

Ruschmann - Tri-Fecta

2025 Charlottesville Tri-Level · Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-16vs Ryan - OverservedLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Chang / Jennifer Farmer vs Diana Whitten / Sherry Lake5-7, 2-6
2025-09-02vs Merrick - KeswickWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Jannemieke Keener vs Cailin Collier / Catherine Wallace6-3, 6-4
2025-08-26vs DiVita - Tri To Beat UsLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Jessicah Collins vs Blair Hubbard / Maren Ward4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMary Anne Burns / Elizabeth Piper vs Dianna Gibson / Elizabeth Pollard6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGretchen Masselli / Patricia Irby vs Katie Cowen / Joan Mower3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEsther Bobbin / Jessica Kinnick vs Lauren Holzman / Caroline Childers6-7, 3-6
2025-08-12vs Ryan - OverservedLost 01
L#2 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Jessicah Collins vs Esther Cho / Kailey Boatright1-6, 3-6
2025-08-05vs Bayliss - ACAC Breaking BadSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Pietro / Wendi Ruschmann vs Lauren Thraves / Esther Bausserman3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Switzer / Lisa Chang vs Lisa Christianson / Apitchaya Miller6-1, 6-0
2025-07-29vs Merrick - KeswickSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Pietro / Wendi Ruschmann vs Cailin Collier / Amanda Tran1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMolly Switzer / Lisa Chang vs Sharon Merrick / Nerissa Rouzer6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Amy Taggart
published 3.5
3.04
Mary Anne Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Patricia Irby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Jannemieke Keener
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Jennifer Farmer
published
2.74
Gretchen Masselli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Wendi Ruschmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Lisa Chang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Jessicah Collins
published
2.56
Amy Bouton
published 2.5
2.46
Esther Bobbin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Molly Switzer
published
2.35
Jessica Kinnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Nancy Polonitza
published
Joan Carlson
published
Laura Pietro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jannemieke Keener + Wendi Ruschmann9954% games+7.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Taggart
141W–98L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Mary Anne Burns
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Patricia Irby
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jennifer Farmer
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Wendi Ruschmann
68W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Lisa Chang
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Jessicah Collins
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
2.5
Amy Bouton
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Esther Bobbin
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Molly Switzer
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
Jessica Kinnick
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Nancy Polonitza
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Joan Carlson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.