Teams

Yoon - One Drive

2024 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-29vs Toro - Net Success 3.0-MWon 10
W#1 SinglesPAUL BAIK vs Gregory Breton7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPAUL BAIK vs Patrick Hughes6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesColin Exelby vs Alexander Sodt6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSung Hwan Yoon vs Sandeep Das7-5, 5-3
2024-10-22vs Toro - Net Success 3.0-MWon 20
W#2 SinglesColin Exelby vs Mehdy Sedaghat Payam6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPAUL BAIK vs UMA SRIKUMARAN6-2, 6-0
2024-10-20vs Uttenreither - Lord of the StringsLost 01
L#1 SinglesSung Hwan Yoon vs Milan Paudel4-6, 4-4
2024-10-13vs Toro - Net Success 3.0-MLost 12
L#1 SinglesPAUL BAIK vs Eric Price6-7, 1-3
W#2 SinglesColin Exelby vs David Djajaputra6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSung Hwan Yoon vs Gregory Breton4-6, 5-7
2024-10-11Won 10
W#3 SinglesSung Hwan Yoon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-10vs Toro - Net Success 3.0-MWon 10
W#1 SinglesColin Exelby vs Gregory Breton3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-09vs Uttenreither - Lord of the StringsLost 02
L#1 SinglesPAUL BAIK vs Sandeep Das4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSung Hwan Yoon vs Kurt Uttenreither4-6, 5-5
2024-10-05vs Toro - Net Success 3.0-MWon 10
W#2 SinglesPAUL BAIK vs David Djajaputra6-7, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Colin Exelby
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Sung Hwan Yoon
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Kabir Goyal
published
3.15
PAUL BAIK
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.96
Seung Kim
published
2.84
Kevin Ro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PAUL BAIK + Sung Hwan Yoon5353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colin Exelby
64W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Sung Hwan Yoon
105W–75L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Kabir Goyal
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
PAUL BAIK
95W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Seung Kim
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.