Teams

Medders/Medders

2024 CORTA 55 & Over Mixed Doubles Regional Championships · 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-24vs Harris/GoldmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Foy / John Morris vs Bokshim Fox / William Harris6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonald Mizzell / Missy Mizzell vs Sue Goldman / Michael Crosby6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAl Dean / Kerri Medders vs Mo Duncan / Karen Collins7-5, 6-4
2024-03-23vs WalburgLost 12
L#1 DoublesAl Dean / Kerri Medders vs Steve Walburg / Lynne Williamson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Barrett / Pam Knight vs Roy Cronise / Bobbi Starr6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Foy / John Morris vs Derick Wolf / Jeanene Wolf6-2, 6-1
2024-03-23vs Calhoun/JonesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Morris / Melissa Foy vs Jeff McBrayer / Chris Tarpley5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Barrett / Pam Knight vs Bonnie Burden / RUSSELL SANDERS6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonald Mizzell / Missy Mizzell vs J David Smith / Margie DeShon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Calhoun/Jones3072772
2Harris/Goldman2154992
3Walburg123613102
4Medders/Medders03361287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
David Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Melissa Foy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Pam Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Missy Mizzell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Kerri Medders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Al Dean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Donald Mizzell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.59
Dennis Medders
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Mizzell + Donald Mizzell224 matchesnot enough data
Missy Mizzell + David Barrett303 matchesnot enough data
Kerri Medders + Al Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Barrett
41W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.69
Melissa Foy
47W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
Pam Knight
54W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Missy Mizzell
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kerri Medders
55W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Al Dean
26W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donald Mizzell
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Dennis Medders
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.