Teams

West Shore - Mix and Match

2022 USTA 55 & Over Mx Doubles League · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-03vs RCW - SumarLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Farley / Vicki Ringquist vs Tom Brink / Kristin Schlageter6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMARK VOGEL / Bonnie Keating vs Beckie Beazley / Dave Beazley4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Brent / Deborah Klenotic vs Linda Scott / Joe Schrader3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-12vs Hempfield - Hangen8Split 11
L#1 DoublesMARK VOGEL / Deborah Klenotic vs Webb Cook / Amber Kroh6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Brent / Bonnie Keating vs Diana Yeagley / Jeff Graby6-4, 7-5
2022-02-26vs YACTA - HeinzelmannLost 02
L#1 DoublesMel Eckhaus / Deborah Klenotic vs Philippe du Bois / Julie Schedin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Brent / Bonnie Keating vs Alan Moyer / Lynne Beck3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-18vs YACTA - HeinzelmannLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Farley / Vicki Ringquist vs Philippe du Bois / Julie Schedin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Brent / Deborah Klenotic vs Douglas Greenholt / Marianne Michels4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMARK VOGEL / Anna Jacobs vs John Montgomery / Lois Jernigan6-7, 1-6
2022-02-11vs Hempfield - PipkinLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Zerby / Anna Jacobs vs Edward Conway / Trisha Pearson4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTerry Farley / Deborah Klenotic vs Philip Hiestand / Susan Eurich4-6, 5-7
2022-02-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesMel Eckhaus / Deborah Klenotic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-28vs Wisehaven - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Jacobs / Steven Zerby vs Bonnie Fissella / Brian Petrides6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / MARK VOGEL vs Terri Mrozinski / Wes Hawk1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-23vs Hershey - Seasoned VeteransLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicki Ringquist / Robert Lentz vs Nancy Opilo / Jenks Landis0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / MARK VOGEL vs Lori Tully / Wilson Wolfe6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Freese / Mel Eckhaus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-14vs RCW - SumarSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVicki Ringquist / Robert Lentz vs John Hufnagel / Catherine Ingram6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Jeff Brent vs Linda Scott / Gregg Pearson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YACTA - Heinzelmann01023718213
2RCW - Sumar010201026249
3Hershey - Seasoned Veterans010191126241
4RCW - Campbell010151535265
5Wisehaven - Taylor010111942305
6West Shore - Mix and Match01092143277
7Hempfield - Hangen801062451327

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Laurie Freese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Bonnie Keating
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Deborah Klenotic
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.60
MARK VOGEL
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.54
Robert Lentz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Jeff Brent
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Anna Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Mel Eckhaus
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Stephen Herzenberg
published
Steven Zerby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Farley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vicki Ringquist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Klenotic + Jeff Brent1443% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Klenotic + MARK VOGEL3256% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Keating + MARK VOGEL3254% gamesnot enough data
Terry Farley + Vicki Ringquist224 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Keating + Jeff Brent134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laurie Freese
100W–86L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Deborah Klenotic
95W–74L career · 11 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
MARK VOGEL
158W–126L career · 8 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Robert Lentz
64W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jeff Brent
50W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Anna Jacobs
106W–100L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Mel Eckhaus
105W–122L career · type A · 12 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Stephen Herzenberg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Zerby
22W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Farley
51W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicki Ringquist
80W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.