Teams

Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Mon PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-05vs Tucker 40s 3.0W Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Trigilio / Laura Wallace vs Tricia Burnett / Mary Mullens6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesHunter Arnett / Lindsey Blackwell vs Kari Eddington / Jeanie Reynolds1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Simpkins / Janine Hawley Girard vs Courtney Reynolds / Katie Bir2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTara Rusiewicz / Kathleen Mooney vs Lynn Crawford / Sue O'Shaughnessy6-4, 6-1
2025-04-21vs Bushnell 40s 3.0W Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesHunter Arnett / Catherine Johnstone vs Amy Kemp / Ashley Bethel6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTara Rusiewicz / Janine Hawley Girard vs Michelle Swinyer / Linda Shuster5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ayers / Kathy Conner vs Kathleen Mattacola / Melisa Lyles3-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs Pitts/Cathey 40s 3.0W Mon PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Mooney / Laura Wallace vs Kimberley Cathey / Jessica Neal0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-07vs Hargett 40s 3.0W Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Geiselhart / Laura Wallace vs Cristina Voorheis / Laura Milloway2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-24vs Stichter 40s 3.0W Mon PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesCassandra Thompson / Kathy Conner vs Samantha Stichter / Laura Otterberg2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTara Rusiewicz / Kathleen Mooney vs Kelly Smith / Sandra Selley6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Sarah Lovett vs Rhonda Wakefield / Mary Chandler Batchelor6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Olalere/Spencer 40s 3.0W Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Conner / Liz Busch vs Gail Little / Shannon Smith2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHunter Arnett / Catherine Johnstone vs Andrea Spencer / Angela Olalere6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Lovett / Cassandra Thompson vs Mary Frances Strand / Annie Vorys2-6, 5-7
2025-03-10vs Ysidron 40s 3.0W Mon PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Mooney / Sandra Simpkins vs Deborah Ysidron / Spring Walsh7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTara Rusiewicz / Liz Busch vs Meredith Heberle / Liliana Varela7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSuzi Cook / Jennifer Ayers vs Whitney Oakley / Meredith Uber6-3, 6-2
2025-03-03vs Dixon/Nall 40s 3.0W - Mon PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Wallace / Sandra Simpkins vs Lisa Simmons / Emily Owen6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Kathleen Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Catherine Johnstone
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Laura Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Jennifer Ayers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Tara Rusiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Sarah Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Kathy Conner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Leigh Trigilio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Liz Busch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Lindsey Blackwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Janine Hawley Girard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Suzi Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Sandra Simpkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Hunter Arnett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Karen Geiselhart
published
2.30
Cassandra Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Mooney + Jennifer Ayers5063% games+12.8% vs expected
Liz Busch + Tara Rusiewicz7652% games+9.1% vs expected
Sandra Simpkins + Janine Hawley Girard044 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Lovett + Catherine Johnstone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Mooney
27W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Catherine Johnstone
34W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Laura Wallace
47W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jennifer Ayers
37W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Tara Rusiewicz
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Sarah Lovett
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kathy Conner
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Leigh Trigilio
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.79
Liz Busch
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lindsey Blackwell
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Janine Hawley Girard
15W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Suzi Cook
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sandra Simpkins
11W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Hunter Arnett
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Karen Geiselhart
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Cassandra Thompson
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.