Teams

String Theory

2023 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-14vs Hit MenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesXavier Ona / Tyrone McRae vs Nikhil Bahl / Kevin McKeel6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHari Mahadevuni / Dominik Cieslak vs Steven Wolf / Carlos Heard3-6, 4-6
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Gruyters / Christopher Williams vs Peter Lallas / Carlos Guerra2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-25vs SOHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTimothy Sprock / Christopher Williams vs Jeeho Lee / Robert Kim6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Gruyters / Dominik Cieslak vs David Kim / Jaeil Ahn7-6, 7-5
2023-05-17vs RPMWon 20
W#1 DoublesTimothy Sprock / Christopher Williams vs Dave Kim / Haibin Bai6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDominik Cieslak / Hari Mahadevuni vs Hyun Soo Kim / Woo Jin Shim6-3, 6-1
2023-05-11vs Hit MenWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Gruyters / Dominik Cieslak vs Dileep Nair / Tony Ryan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-01vs I'd Hit That 18+ 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDominik Cieslak / Christopher Williams vs Surendra Babu / Simon Linder0-6, 3-6
2023-04-28vs CJ RocksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTimothy Sprock / Xavier Ona vs Christopher Garlock / Renhuan Xu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDominik Cieslak / Steven Gruyters vs Carlos Guerra / Jing Gu6-2, 6-4
2023-04-19vs SOHWon 10
W#3 DoublesDominik Cieslak / Taft Irons vs Jaeil Ahn / Chan Young Jung6-4, 6-1
2023-04-16vs RPMLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Tyrone McRae vs KC Song / George Liu - (DQ)*1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesXavier Ona vs ShiMing Chen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDominik Cieslak / Steven Gruyters vs Dave Kim / Haibin Bai6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Xavier Ona
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Ezhilan Ulaganathan
published 3.5
3.30
Dominik Cieslak
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Christopher Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.88
Stephen Rawlings
published
Taft Irons
published
Tyrone McRae
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominik Cieslak + Christopher Williams134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Xavier Ona
132W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Ezhilan Ulaganathan
0W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Dominik Cieslak
113W–91L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Rawlings
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Taft Irons
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyrone McRae
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.