Teams

Burch - RS Hard

2026 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-29vs Sparks - RS HardWon 40
W#1 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Christin Mathis / Kiley Leonard6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStacy Wilks vs Danielle Turner6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Davis / Lauren Burch vs Jennifer Washington / Morgan Mclaughlin6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAndrea Falce vs Jessic Melton6-2, 5-2
2026-06-11vs Ross - RS ClayWon 32
L#1 DoublesAndrea Falce / Michelle Davis vs Tonya Chase / Susan Rice6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHaley Allen vs Natalia Burroughs7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShelby Shockley / Jill Wilson vs Kathy Ross / Brianna Ross4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStacy Wilks vs Janet Brennen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mohanco / Sarah Ahlstrand vs Catherine Butterworth / Allison McCrory6-1, 6-2
2026-06-04vs Craft - RS HardWon 32
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lochas / Stacy Wilks vs Morgan Craft / Camille Neuner0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Burch vs Reghan Robinson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarianna Massey / Megan Frederick vs Pressly Weil / Jasmine Agadzi6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHaley Allen vs Brooke Vance3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Canada / Vanessa Vey vs Tammie Coco / Victoria Grise7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-28vs Fell - SHLWon 32
L#1 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Erin Nunnari / Hunter Strobel2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaggie Riggs vs Karen Crane6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelby Shockley / Marianna Massey vs Denny Rarrick / Kimberly Etscheid6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHaley Allen vs Courtney Fell6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaggie Lochas / Stacy Wilks vs Teresa Berg / Liliya Slutsker6-2, 7-6
2026-05-14vs Miller - PCCWon 41
W#1 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Amy Zoesch / Elly Twidwell7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMaggie Riggs vs Katie Miller6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Wilson / Maggie Lochas vs Jennifer Lewis / Irie Vance7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMary Canada vs Allee Blay-Digby6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSarah Ahlstrand / Jennifer Mohanco vs Madyson Stacker / Kelsey Sholes6-2, 6-4
2026-05-07vs DellaFera - RS HardSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Davis / Mallie Woodfin vs Kimberly Fortier / Francine Costa2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Burch vs Dakota DellaFera6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Frederick / Maggie Riggs vs Heysi Mcmillon / Fernanda Zamorano Rozas3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVanessa Vey / Mary Canada vs Natalie Nguyen / Mary Pene6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Lauren Burch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Mary Canada
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Stacy Wilks
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Jill Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Haley Allen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Andrea Falce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Marianna Massey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Kacee Bidnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Vanessa Vey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Maggie Lochas
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Maggie Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Jennifer Mohanco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mallie Woodfin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Ahlstrand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelby Shockley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Canada + Vanessa Vey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Burch
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Mary Canada
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Stacy Wilks
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Jill Wilson
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Haley Allen
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Andrea Falce
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marianna Massey
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Vanessa Vey
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Maggie Lochas
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Maggie Riggs
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Jennifer Mohanco
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mallie Woodfin
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Ahlstrand
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelby Shockley
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.