Teams

BC-ElDorado/ReneeRoyles

2025 TRI LEVEL MX June · Aug - 4.0 3.5 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-08vs BC-LLW-BillieJeanKing/VickyTrinhLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlison King / Frank Xing vs Ashley Liaw / David Kim1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Royles / Ryan Loo vs Camille Hanson / Carl Stern1-2
2025-06-14vs BC-LLW-BillieJeanKing/VickyTrinhSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArturo Velazquez / Rachael Stone vs Chloe Kishel / Christopher Contreras1-3
L#3 DoublesNadine Wong / Ryan Loo vs Taka Shimazu / Veronika Zherdeva5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Aug - 4.0 3.5 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Laura del Beccaro
published 4.5
4.29
Kosuke Imazeki
published
3.86
Rachael Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Rebecca Escandon
published 4
3.64
Frank Xing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
William Padula
published
Audie Leksunthon
published 3.5
3.16
Jason Mora
published
3.14
Ryan Loo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Renee Royles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Nadine Wong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Alvin Chong
published 3.5
2.69
Karen Willaman
published 3
Joshua Gurevich
published
Kara Finnegan
published
Stephanie Padula
published
Timothy Bryant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Bryant + Rebecca Escandon314 matchesnot enough data
Laura del Beccaro + Timothy Bryant213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura del Beccaro
68W–44L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Kosuke Imazeki
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Rachael Stone
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.86
4
Rebecca Escandon
158W–86L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Frank Xing
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
William Padula
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Audie Leksunthon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Mora
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Ryan Loo
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Renee Royles
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Nadine Wong
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Alvin Chong
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Karen Willaman
64W–78L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Joshua Gurevich
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Finnegan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Padula
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Bryant
27W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.