Teams

Burkwood Golden

2025 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-04vs Raintree Campbell 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe VANCE / Kirk Clausen vs Stuart Dowdy / Shawkat Rana4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Bailey / Andrew Barth vs Slava Sery / Robert Arthur2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Golden / Richard Siford vs Mark Rosenkrantz / William Seidel6-0, 6-1
2025-05-20vs TDC Prince 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Barth / Joe VANCE vs Jim Swisher / Nelson Dawson7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKirk Clausen / Richard Shute vs Rusty Dean / William Shirey4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Bohrer / Richard Siford vs Brent Garrison / John Gross6-0, 6-0
2025-04-23vs MTC Still Got Game 7.0 - CookWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Bailey / Kirk Clausen vs Johnny Joyner / Jeffrey Johnson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Golden / Richard Shute vs Doug Cook / Lewis Farinholt6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Gallagher / Floyd Hetzer vs Bernie Niemeier / Eugene Johnson6-0, 7-6
2025-04-16vs Raintree Campbell 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Golden / Richard Siford vs Shawkat Rana / Stuart Dowdy5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Bohrer / John Bailey vs Thomas Wood / Slava Sery6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Barth / Floyd Hetzer vs Robert Arthur / Karl Enters7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Andrew Barth
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Floyd Hetzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joe VANCE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Golden
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kirk Clausen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Bohrer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Shute
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Siford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirk Clausen + Andrew Barth3353% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Golden + Richard Shute5165% gamesnot enough data
Richard Siford + Joseph Golden3264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Barth
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Floyd Hetzer
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
Joe VANCE
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirk Clausen
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Bohrer
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Shute
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Siford
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.